june 9
California school host toy gun buy-back, kinda
Pictured: Calum Robertson from an article on Sam Paior
By Dank Da Tank
The concept of a gun buy-back program is not a new one, what surprises me is a toy gun by back. Stonebridge Elementary School in Haywood California will be hosting a toy gun buy-back on Saturday 6/15/13. Kids and parents will be lining up to turn in Nerf guns, cap guns,disc guns and water guns in exchange for a raffle ticket that's good for a chance to win a bicycle. Personally I see that as a bit of raw deal. At least at the regular gun buy-back you get a $50-100 gift card to a store one might actually go to and spend the money. In this case there is no money, there is a raffle ticket. I look at this and I see kids getting cheated out of toys.
The event is being called Stonebridge Elementary Safety Day, and will be featuring a Haywood police officer talking about gun safety and bicycle safety. Charles Hill the school's principal believe's they are on the right track. He explains, "Playing with toys guns, saying 'I'm going to shoot you,' desensitizes them, so as they get older, it's easier for them to use a real gun."An opponent of Hill is is Yih-Chau Chang, a spokesmen for Responsible Citizens of California; a pro gun group is Quoted speaking about Stonebridge Safety Day as saying “Having a group of children playing cops and robbers or cowboys and Indians is a normal part of growing up,""While the intentions are obviously good on the part of the school administration, this doesn't really educate children about guns or gun safety. Guns are used in crimes, but they are more often used in defensive ways which prevent violent crime from occurring in the first place."
Chang also points out that the program maybe vilifying toy guns that do look anything like their more lethal counterpart. Hill disagrees saying "Some of the guns I've confiscated, if they're stuck down in a waistband, the average person would think it's a real gun," he said. "I could easily see one of our sixth-graders wanting to fake out someone at a 7-Eleven by walking in there. They would think it's funny, but it could turn into tragedy."
The concept of a gun buy-back program is not a new one, what surprises me is a toy gun by back. Stonebridge Elementary School in Haywood California will be hosting a toy gun buy-back on Saturday 6/15/13. Kids and parents will be lining up to turn in Nerf guns, cap guns,disc guns and water guns in exchange for a raffle ticket that's good for a chance to win a bicycle. Personally I see that as a bit of raw deal. At least at the regular gun buy-back you get a $50-100 gift card to a store one might actually go to and spend the money. In this case there is no money, there is a raffle ticket. I look at this and I see kids getting cheated out of toys.
The event is being called Stonebridge Elementary Safety Day, and will be featuring a Haywood police officer talking about gun safety and bicycle safety. Charles Hill the school's principal believe's they are on the right track. He explains, "Playing with toys guns, saying 'I'm going to shoot you,' desensitizes them, so as they get older, it's easier for them to use a real gun."An opponent of Hill is is Yih-Chau Chang, a spokesmen for Responsible Citizens of California; a pro gun group is Quoted speaking about Stonebridge Safety Day as saying “Having a group of children playing cops and robbers or cowboys and Indians is a normal part of growing up,""While the intentions are obviously good on the part of the school administration, this doesn't really educate children about guns or gun safety. Guns are used in crimes, but they are more often used in defensive ways which prevent violent crime from occurring in the first place."
Chang also points out that the program maybe vilifying toy guns that do look anything like their more lethal counterpart. Hill disagrees saying "Some of the guns I've confiscated, if they're stuck down in a waistband, the average person would think it's a real gun," he said. "I could easily see one of our sixth-graders wanting to fake out someone at a 7-Eleven by walking in there. They would think it's funny, but it could turn into tragedy."
With a little research I found out that toy-gun buy back is not all that new of an idea. A mom from Adelaide Australia found herself shook up over the way her sons played with their toys guns after the Sandy Hook massacre. Sam Paior acted not with the gun grabbers nor with the gun-nuts. Rather than haphazardly taking away her kids toys, she started a longstanding and meaningful conversation with her sons by offering them $5 dollars for each "gun" they sell back to mom. Unfortunately when Sam tried to reach out and find like minded adults on Facebook. There Sam's opponents there displayed the same type of aggression and violence that she was trying to discourage in her boys. Comments on her page ranged from "twat" and "imbecile" to "idiot" and "nutter". Even the suggestion that she should teach her boys gun respect and safety; which I tend to agree with even though I don't like guns; was lost in over 400 comments of hate mongers toward any anti-gun advocates.
This is America, where everyone has the Right to a weapon to defend themselves. In America we shouldn't require guns just like we shouldn't ban them. In America; if you like it, do it lawfully. In America; if you don't like it don't do it. But by some means, by any means, can't we all just get along.
This is America, where everyone has the Right to a weapon to defend themselves. In America we shouldn't require guns just like we shouldn't ban them. In America; if you like it, do it lawfully. In America; if you don't like it don't do it. But by some means, by any means, can't we all just get along.
June 2
Transexual super hero alreay rescuing your children from their gender
By Dank the Tank
You might know Hasbro has been setting up to release a cartoon aimed at both males and females in the pre-teen target age called SheZow. When I saw this headline on my Facebook news feed I thought, “Surely this isn’t what the FCC standards and practices will allow in our country.” So I thought no more of it until this morning when I stumbled upon a rerun of Saturday morning’s series premier of SheZow on the Hub. If you’re not aware the Hub is a network I came to appreciate because it plays old classic cartoons allowing two or more generations to enjoy the same shows, a network I might watch with my baby sister. This is why this airing has me so upset.
I remember a time when Saturday morning was a time for innocent fantasy for kids and a chance to relive part of your child hood for adults. In my memory my favorite Saturday morning was the series premier of the Original Power Rangers. I was so excited for the premier and I loved the show to death; unknown to me, my father was watching from the couch behind me and at the end he said “It’s just Voltron” and that was the start of many conversation about the differences in cartoon from his generation and mine. I wonder what conversations were prompted by this pun-laced propaganda. I wonder how many parents just shied away from conversations about this gender bending super hero/heroine.
Summary: a boy picks up the family super legacy by accident and is stuck as his aunt Agnos’ alter ego SheZow. While he is not happy with the clothes and the hair, he’s more than happy to put up with them for the gadgets and superpowers including lipstick light saber, super speed, super strength, and a super scream. Take a look for yourself and keep tally of how many female related puns you hear.
You might know Hasbro has been setting up to release a cartoon aimed at both males and females in the pre-teen target age called SheZow. When I saw this headline on my Facebook news feed I thought, “Surely this isn’t what the FCC standards and practices will allow in our country.” So I thought no more of it until this morning when I stumbled upon a rerun of Saturday morning’s series premier of SheZow on the Hub. If you’re not aware the Hub is a network I came to appreciate because it plays old classic cartoons allowing two or more generations to enjoy the same shows, a network I might watch with my baby sister. This is why this airing has me so upset.
I remember a time when Saturday morning was a time for innocent fantasy for kids and a chance to relive part of your child hood for adults. In my memory my favorite Saturday morning was the series premier of the Original Power Rangers. I was so excited for the premier and I loved the show to death; unknown to me, my father was watching from the couch behind me and at the end he said “It’s just Voltron” and that was the start of many conversation about the differences in cartoon from his generation and mine. I wonder what conversations were prompted by this pun-laced propaganda. I wonder how many parents just shied away from conversations about this gender bending super hero/heroine.
Summary: a boy picks up the family super legacy by accident and is stuck as his aunt Agnos’ alter ego SheZow. While he is not happy with the clothes and the hair, he’s more than happy to put up with them for the gadgets and superpowers including lipstick light saber, super speed, super strength, and a super scream. Take a look for yourself and keep tally of how many female related puns you hear.
What follows is only my observations and opinions
You may have watched that and asked “What’s so wrong with that?” If you you’re not like me and you think that there is no agenda against the willfully ignorant public, then you may have just seen a cartoon that just fun and meant for kids and not enough to be discussed in adult conversation. Unfortunately, I saw several insinuated stereotypes being subconsciously indoctrinated in the children of the next generation.
The first “joke that caught my attention was a reference that a “guy thing” was something to laugh at. Next was a reference to “woman’s work” i.e. unpacking, which I didn’t really get. I’d never heard that before but I’m sure that will be a platform for the new unisex society. Then after that you have to get past the whole gender bending super hero/heroine when brother and sister find the ring and fate has it that the brother puts it on for no reason. Right about the time they found the SHEILA the super computer I said “This is going overuse the she-puns”.
That brings me to the apparent purpose of those puns. There is more than any kids cartoon’s share of anti-male stereotypes in just there first episode. Without saying it the show implies that men are messy, dumb, gullible, and clumsy. I don’t want to go into specifics feel free to watch it again and tell me if you see these things. SheZow also depicts men as easily swayed on position if the can get a cool gadget or a fast car, even if it’s pink.
Lastly where are the parents of the siblings while are finding super powers and saving the world? God knows! We do see them at the dinner table where we find out that the father who is a cop is not in favor of SheZow the vigilante. Now there is reason for the young man in drag to buck his chest out at the father because he saved the city. But since the father was so preoccupied with his jealousy and the mother was so preoccupied with her admiration of SheZow that they missed their son in costume right in front of them. This is what don’t want to happen to you all, be aware of what your children watching and what it’s telling them.
The first “joke that caught my attention was a reference that a “guy thing” was something to laugh at. Next was a reference to “woman’s work” i.e. unpacking, which I didn’t really get. I’d never heard that before but I’m sure that will be a platform for the new unisex society. Then after that you have to get past the whole gender bending super hero/heroine when brother and sister find the ring and fate has it that the brother puts it on for no reason. Right about the time they found the SHEILA the super computer I said “This is going overuse the she-puns”.
That brings me to the apparent purpose of those puns. There is more than any kids cartoon’s share of anti-male stereotypes in just there first episode. Without saying it the show implies that men are messy, dumb, gullible, and clumsy. I don’t want to go into specifics feel free to watch it again and tell me if you see these things. SheZow also depicts men as easily swayed on position if the can get a cool gadget or a fast car, even if it’s pink.
Lastly where are the parents of the siblings while are finding super powers and saving the world? God knows! We do see them at the dinner table where we find out that the father who is a cop is not in favor of SheZow the vigilante. Now there is reason for the young man in drag to buck his chest out at the father because he saved the city. But since the father was so preoccupied with his jealousy and the mother was so preoccupied with her admiration of SheZow that they missed their son in costume right in front of them. This is what don’t want to happen to you all, be aware of what your children watching and what it’s telling them.
May 30
Zero TOLERANCE gone all bad
From the desk of Donna St. George
A kindergartner who brought a cowboy-style cap gun on to his Calvert County school bus was suspended for 10 days after showing a friend the orange-tipped toy, which he had tucked inside his backpack on his way to school, according to his family and a lawyer.
The child was questioned for more than two hours before his mother was called, she said, adding that he uncharacteristically wet his pants during the episode. The boy is 5 — “all bugs and frogs and cowboys,” his mother said
.“I have no problem that he had a consequence to his behavior,” said the mother, who asked that her name be withheld to protect her son’s privacy.“What I have a problem with is the severity,” she said, and the way it was handled.
The family’s attorney appealed the suspension late Thursday, asking that the action be reversed and the child’s record be expunged.
If the punishment stands, it would become part of the boy’s permanent school record and keep him out of classes the rest of the school year, the family said. He would miss his end-of-year kindergarten program at Dowell Elementary School in Lusby.
The issue will be examined at a disciplinary conference Friday.
Kim Roof, executive director of administration for Calvert schools, said she could not comment on the case but pointed out that such incidents are fully reviewed at disciplinary conferences to determine the most appropriate outcome.
The case comes at a time of heightened sensitivity about guns in schools across the country. Locally, children in first and second grade have been disciplined for pointing their fingers like guns and for chewing a Pop-Tart-like pastry into the shape of a gun. In Pennsylvania, a 5-year-old was suspended for talking about shooting a Hello Kitty bubble gun that blows soap bubbles.
In Calvert County, the trouble began Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. on a 10-minute bus ride to school.
According to the family, the boy’s friend had brought a water gun on the bus a day earlier. On Wednesday, unbeknown to his parents, the boy stowed his cap gun — from Frontier Town near Ocean City — inside his backpack as he left for school.
He told his mother after the incident that he had “really, really” wanted to show his friend.
The mother was called by the principal at 10:50 a.m. and was told that her son had the cap gun and pretended to shoot someone on the bus. She said that both the kindergartner and his first-grade sister, sitting nearby on the bus, disputed that account.
The mother said the principal told her that if the cap gun had been loaded with caps, it would have been deemed an explosive and police would have been called in.
The child’s disciplinary referral said he was being suspended for possession of a look-alike gun.
The child’s mother is a high school teacher in Calvert who said she strongly supports the school system and loves the teachers at her son’s school. She and her husband, who coaches youth sports, are active community volunteers.
For the family, a major concern is the long period the 5-year-old was questioned without parental guidance or support. His sister was questioned, too, she said.
“The school was quite obviously taking it very seriously, and he’s 5 years old,” she said. “Why were we not immediately contacted?”
The family’s attorney, Robin Ficker, said that the age of the child is important and that the incident could have been used as a teachable moment.
“Kids play cowboys and Indians,” he said. “They play cops and robbers. You’re talking about a little 5-year-old here.”
A kindergartner who brought a cowboy-style cap gun on to his Calvert County school bus was suspended for 10 days after showing a friend the orange-tipped toy, which he had tucked inside his backpack on his way to school, according to his family and a lawyer.
The child was questioned for more than two hours before his mother was called, she said, adding that he uncharacteristically wet his pants during the episode. The boy is 5 — “all bugs and frogs and cowboys,” his mother said
.“I have no problem that he had a consequence to his behavior,” said the mother, who asked that her name be withheld to protect her son’s privacy.“What I have a problem with is the severity,” she said, and the way it was handled.
The family’s attorney appealed the suspension late Thursday, asking that the action be reversed and the child’s record be expunged.
If the punishment stands, it would become part of the boy’s permanent school record and keep him out of classes the rest of the school year, the family said. He would miss his end-of-year kindergarten program at Dowell Elementary School in Lusby.
The issue will be examined at a disciplinary conference Friday.
Kim Roof, executive director of administration for Calvert schools, said she could not comment on the case but pointed out that such incidents are fully reviewed at disciplinary conferences to determine the most appropriate outcome.
The case comes at a time of heightened sensitivity about guns in schools across the country. Locally, children in first and second grade have been disciplined for pointing their fingers like guns and for chewing a Pop-Tart-like pastry into the shape of a gun. In Pennsylvania, a 5-year-old was suspended for talking about shooting a Hello Kitty bubble gun that blows soap bubbles.
In Calvert County, the trouble began Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. on a 10-minute bus ride to school.
According to the family, the boy’s friend had brought a water gun on the bus a day earlier. On Wednesday, unbeknown to his parents, the boy stowed his cap gun — from Frontier Town near Ocean City — inside his backpack as he left for school.
He told his mother after the incident that he had “really, really” wanted to show his friend.
The mother was called by the principal at 10:50 a.m. and was told that her son had the cap gun and pretended to shoot someone on the bus. She said that both the kindergartner and his first-grade sister, sitting nearby on the bus, disputed that account.
The mother said the principal told her that if the cap gun had been loaded with caps, it would have been deemed an explosive and police would have been called in.
The child’s disciplinary referral said he was being suspended for possession of a look-alike gun.
The child’s mother is a high school teacher in Calvert who said she strongly supports the school system and loves the teachers at her son’s school. She and her husband, who coaches youth sports, are active community volunteers.
For the family, a major concern is the long period the 5-year-old was questioned without parental guidance or support. His sister was questioned, too, she said.
“The school was quite obviously taking it very seriously, and he’s 5 years old,” she said. “Why were we not immediately contacted?”
The family’s attorney, Robin Ficker, said that the age of the child is important and that the incident could have been used as a teachable moment.
“Kids play cowboys and Indians,” he said. “They play cops and robbers. You’re talking about a little 5-year-old here.”
Update: Armed march on d.c. canceled by kokesh
What the founders would have said about this march if they were alive today.
It appears, for a variety of reasons (take your pick) The march on D.C. has been canceled. you can look up the what's what on the march the plans of those who planned to attend via their facebook group.
https://www.facebook.com/events/252728144871259/?ref=3
https://www.facebook.com/events/252728144871259/?ref=3
May 23
adam kokesh Calls for revolution on all the capitals of the United states of America
What follows is Kokesh’s complete and unabridged statement.
“When a government has repeatedly and deliberately failed to follow its own laws, violated the fundamental human rights of its citizens, threatened the sanctity of a free press, created institutions intended to eliminate privacy of communication, waged war at the behest of special interest that threatens the public safety, killed hundreds of children with drone strikes, imprisoned and destroyed the lives of countless individuals for victimless crimes, stifled economic opportunity to maintain the dominance of the financial elite, stolen from the people through an absurd system of taxation and inflation, sold future generations into debt slavery, and abused its power to suppress political opposition, it is unfit to exist and it becomes the duty of the people to alter or abolish that government by whatever means necessary to secure liberty and ensure peace.
“A new American revolution is long overdue. This revolution has been brewing in the hearts and minds of the people for many years, but this Independence Day, it shall take a new form as the American Revolutionary Army will march on each state capital to demand that the governors of these 50 states immediately initiate the process of an orderly dissolution of the federal government through secession and reclamation of federally held property. Should one whole year from this July 4th pass while the crimes of this government are allowed to continue, we may have passed the point at which non-violent revolution becomes impossible.
“The time to sit idly by has passed. To remain neutral is to be complicit, just doing your job is not an excuse, and the line in the sand has been drawn between the people, and the criminals in Washington, D.C. While some timid souls will say that it is too early, that we can solve this problem through democratic means provided by government, that current levels of taxation are reasonable for the services provided, and that the crimes of this government are merely a tolerable nuisance, it may already be too late.
“While there is risk in drastic action, the greater danger lies in allowing this government to continue unchallenged. So if you are content with the status quo, stay home, get fat, watch the fireworks from a safe distance, and allow this Independence Day to pass like any other. But if you see as we see, and feel as we feel, we will see you on the front lines of freedom on July 4th, 2013 for this, The Final American Revolution.”
Signed, Adam Kokesh, May 23, 2013 from a cage in the Philadelphia federal prison.
Source: http://freeadam.net/2013/05/24/adam-kokesh-march-50-state-capitols/
Adam Kokesh has most recently been in the news for the abrupt arrest at a non-violent "smoke-out protest/rally in Philadelphia.
Bellow are two angles of that arrest.
“When a government has repeatedly and deliberately failed to follow its own laws, violated the fundamental human rights of its citizens, threatened the sanctity of a free press, created institutions intended to eliminate privacy of communication, waged war at the behest of special interest that threatens the public safety, killed hundreds of children with drone strikes, imprisoned and destroyed the lives of countless individuals for victimless crimes, stifled economic opportunity to maintain the dominance of the financial elite, stolen from the people through an absurd system of taxation and inflation, sold future generations into debt slavery, and abused its power to suppress political opposition, it is unfit to exist and it becomes the duty of the people to alter or abolish that government by whatever means necessary to secure liberty and ensure peace.
“A new American revolution is long overdue. This revolution has been brewing in the hearts and minds of the people for many years, but this Independence Day, it shall take a new form as the American Revolutionary Army will march on each state capital to demand that the governors of these 50 states immediately initiate the process of an orderly dissolution of the federal government through secession and reclamation of federally held property. Should one whole year from this July 4th pass while the crimes of this government are allowed to continue, we may have passed the point at which non-violent revolution becomes impossible.
“The time to sit idly by has passed. To remain neutral is to be complicit, just doing your job is not an excuse, and the line in the sand has been drawn between the people, and the criminals in Washington, D.C. While some timid souls will say that it is too early, that we can solve this problem through democratic means provided by government, that current levels of taxation are reasonable for the services provided, and that the crimes of this government are merely a tolerable nuisance, it may already be too late.
“While there is risk in drastic action, the greater danger lies in allowing this government to continue unchallenged. So if you are content with the status quo, stay home, get fat, watch the fireworks from a safe distance, and allow this Independence Day to pass like any other. But if you see as we see, and feel as we feel, we will see you on the front lines of freedom on July 4th, 2013 for this, The Final American Revolution.”
Signed, Adam Kokesh, May 23, 2013 from a cage in the Philadelphia federal prison.
Source: http://freeadam.net/2013/05/24/adam-kokesh-march-50-state-capitols/
Adam Kokesh has most recently been in the news for the abrupt arrest at a non-violent "smoke-out protest/rally in Philadelphia.
Bellow are two angles of that arrest.
|
|
ASSATA SHAKUR ADDED TO THE FBI'S TERROR LIST
"At this point, I think that it is important to make one thing very clear. I have advocated and I still advocate revolutionary changes in the structure and in the principles that govern the United States. I advocate self-determination for my people and for all oppressed inside the United States. I advocate an end to capitalist exploitation, the abolition of racist policies, the eradication of sexism, and the elimination of political repression. If that is a crime, then I am totally guilty."
|
|
MAY 2
THOUGHTS: THIS COP SHOULD GO TO JAIL. HE NEVER ONCE SHOWED ID OR A BADGE. THIS VIDEO WILL PROVE HOW CORRUPT THE POLICE ARE AND SOME ON A HUGE POWER TRIP!
MAY 1
BOSTON 2 HOURS AFTER
april 20 (Posted by Dank)
Only three words can describe this Video
"This is TYRANNY"
April 18 (Posted by Cheeba)
Crimes Against Humanity: Arrest Warrants Issued for Pope Benedict XVI, Queen Elizabeth, and Stephen Harper
Pope Benedict XVI, also known Joseph Ratzinger, recently stepped down, citing a lack of strength brought on by his advanced age [1]. In the history of the Roman Catholic Church, a Pope has never resigned because of infirmity; they are expected to die in office [2]. So what’s the real story? Did Ratzinger forget that the papacy is a lifelong position, or is there a more credible explanation for his decision? In 2010, a “citizen-based Tribunal of Conscience” was founded in Dublin, Ireland. Known as the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State, the ITCCS is based on an international legal principle known as the Necessity Act, according to which a court can be established under common law. While its central office is located in Brussels, Belgium, the ITCCS is spread across fifteen different countries. Its team consists of common law legal consultants, lawyers with the Center for Constitutional Rights, sworn Citizen Jurors, judges, and others [3].
The objective of ITCCS is to “bring to trial those persons and institutions responsible for the exploitation, torture and murder of children, past and present,” and to “stop these and other criminal actions by churches, corporations and governments” [4]. They have compiled sworn affidavits and hours of video evidence, implicating both individuals and institutions in what appears to be abuse of a systemic nature. One of the institutions implicated is the Roman Catholic Church.
On February 1st , 2013 the ITCCS found Joseph Ratzinger guilty of “committing or aiding and abetting Crimes against Humanity, and of being part of an ongoing Criminal Conspiracy” [5]. On February 4th, he announced his resignation as Pope, saying he was unable to fulfill his duties. Of course correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but Ratzinger is also said to have met with Italian President Giorgio Napolitano on February 23rd , reportedly seeking immunity from prosecution [6]. Clearly, Ratzinger is concerned about something. So what exactly is the case against him?
Although both the Canadian government and the Roman Catholic Church have long endeavored to bury it [7], there is a growing body of evidence for a so-called “Canadian Holocaust.” From 1884 to 1984, at least 150,000 Native Canadian children were forcibly removed from their homes and placed in government-funded, church-administered residential schools. This was done in an attempt to exterminate Native cultures and assimilate their populations into the dominant paradigm [8].
Yet these residential schools threatened far more than the cultures of Native peoples. As early as 1907, it was reported by the Medical Inspector for the Department of Indian Affairs that the residential school students were being deliberately infected with tuberculosis, resulting in an average mortality rate of 40%. By 1919, that figure was as high as 75% in some schools–only one in four students would survive their so-called “education.” As for those who did survive, many would go on to endure physical abuse, sexual abuse, and forced sterilizations. Incredibly, some would even become involuntary test subjects for the CIA’s research into mind control, also known as Project MK-ULTRA [9].
Although it is beyond the scope of this article to consider the evidence in any greater detail, it is for these reasons and many others that the ITCCS has concluded that Pope Benedict, Stephen Harper, and even the Queen of England are complicit in crimes against humanity. For readers inclined to look into the matter further, some of the evidence against these individuals is presented in the following video:
It is the opinion of this writer that the Pope’s resignation is of profound social and political import. Historians will write of this time, noting that the verdict of the ITCCS marked a milestone in the liberation of humanity. They will write about how a de jure common law court, an international court of the people, established a legal mechanism that empowered citizens to hold their leaders accountable for their actions.
The influence of the ITCCS, however, is entirely dependent upon the impetus of the people. This verdict will be ignored by the mainstream media, it will be disavowed by our politicians, and our police officers will not recognize its legitimacy—unless we demand otherwise. For this reason, each of us has a moral responsibility to hold the convicted individuals and institutions accountable in whatever way we can. There are numerous things that we can do, from simply sharing this news and explaining what the ITCCS is, to occupying churches and compiling further documentation of the crimes of Church and State. An extensive list of actions recommended by the ITCCS can be found here.
If enough of us stand behind the ITCCS, there is no limit to what we might accomplish. When we fully consider how many times and in how many ways we have been abused and exploited by our governments and religious institutions, we will see that the Canadian Holocaust is only one piece in a very large puzzle. Who else do we suspect of crimes against humanity? Who are your tyrants?
References:
[1] Radio Free Europe, 2013
http://www.rferl.org/content/pope-resignation-speech/24898847.html
[2] Wikipedia, 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_resignation
[3] ITCCS – History, 2013
http://itccs.org/calendar/
[4] Ibid.
[5] ITCCS – Guilty, 2013
http://itccs.org/2013/02/25/guilty/
[6] Vatican Crimes, 2013
http://www.vaticancrimes.us/2013/02/pope-benedict-xvi-to-seek-immunity-from.html
[7] ITCCS – Church Crimes, 2011
http://itccs.org/tag/church-crimes/page/3/
[8] Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada – About Us, 2013
http://www.trc-cvr.ca/about.html
[9] Canadian Genocide – Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust, 2003
http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/intro2.html
The objective of ITCCS is to “bring to trial those persons and institutions responsible for the exploitation, torture and murder of children, past and present,” and to “stop these and other criminal actions by churches, corporations and governments” [4]. They have compiled sworn affidavits and hours of video evidence, implicating both individuals and institutions in what appears to be abuse of a systemic nature. One of the institutions implicated is the Roman Catholic Church.
On February 1st , 2013 the ITCCS found Joseph Ratzinger guilty of “committing or aiding and abetting Crimes against Humanity, and of being part of an ongoing Criminal Conspiracy” [5]. On February 4th, he announced his resignation as Pope, saying he was unable to fulfill his duties. Of course correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but Ratzinger is also said to have met with Italian President Giorgio Napolitano on February 23rd , reportedly seeking immunity from prosecution [6]. Clearly, Ratzinger is concerned about something. So what exactly is the case against him?
Although both the Canadian government and the Roman Catholic Church have long endeavored to bury it [7], there is a growing body of evidence for a so-called “Canadian Holocaust.” From 1884 to 1984, at least 150,000 Native Canadian children were forcibly removed from their homes and placed in government-funded, church-administered residential schools. This was done in an attempt to exterminate Native cultures and assimilate their populations into the dominant paradigm [8].
Yet these residential schools threatened far more than the cultures of Native peoples. As early as 1907, it was reported by the Medical Inspector for the Department of Indian Affairs that the residential school students were being deliberately infected with tuberculosis, resulting in an average mortality rate of 40%. By 1919, that figure was as high as 75% in some schools–only one in four students would survive their so-called “education.” As for those who did survive, many would go on to endure physical abuse, sexual abuse, and forced sterilizations. Incredibly, some would even become involuntary test subjects for the CIA’s research into mind control, also known as Project MK-ULTRA [9].
Although it is beyond the scope of this article to consider the evidence in any greater detail, it is for these reasons and many others that the ITCCS has concluded that Pope Benedict, Stephen Harper, and even the Queen of England are complicit in crimes against humanity. For readers inclined to look into the matter further, some of the evidence against these individuals is presented in the following video:
It is the opinion of this writer that the Pope’s resignation is of profound social and political import. Historians will write of this time, noting that the verdict of the ITCCS marked a milestone in the liberation of humanity. They will write about how a de jure common law court, an international court of the people, established a legal mechanism that empowered citizens to hold their leaders accountable for their actions.
The influence of the ITCCS, however, is entirely dependent upon the impetus of the people. This verdict will be ignored by the mainstream media, it will be disavowed by our politicians, and our police officers will not recognize its legitimacy—unless we demand otherwise. For this reason, each of us has a moral responsibility to hold the convicted individuals and institutions accountable in whatever way we can. There are numerous things that we can do, from simply sharing this news and explaining what the ITCCS is, to occupying churches and compiling further documentation of the crimes of Church and State. An extensive list of actions recommended by the ITCCS can be found here.
If enough of us stand behind the ITCCS, there is no limit to what we might accomplish. When we fully consider how many times and in how many ways we have been abused and exploited by our governments and religious institutions, we will see that the Canadian Holocaust is only one piece in a very large puzzle. Who else do we suspect of crimes against humanity? Who are your tyrants?
References:
[1] Radio Free Europe, 2013
http://www.rferl.org/content/pope-resignation-speech/24898847.html
[2] Wikipedia, 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_resignation
[3] ITCCS – History, 2013
http://itccs.org/calendar/
[4] Ibid.
[5] ITCCS – Guilty, 2013
http://itccs.org/2013/02/25/guilty/
[6] Vatican Crimes, 2013
http://www.vaticancrimes.us/2013/02/pope-benedict-xvi-to-seek-immunity-from.html
[7] ITCCS – Church Crimes, 2011
http://itccs.org/tag/church-crimes/page/3/
[8] Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada – About Us, 2013
http://www.trc-cvr.ca/about.html
[9] Canadian Genocide – Hidden from History: The Canadian Holocaust, 2003
http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/intro2.html
Teen: I Am Not the Boston Marathon Bomber
From the desk of ABC News (Posted by powers)
The teenage boy authorities once investigated as possibly being connected to the Boston Marathon bombing told ABC News today he was shocked to see his face pop up on television and all over social media.
Salah Barhoun, 17, said he went to the police yesterday to clear his name after he found himself tagged in pictures online. He had just gone to watch the race, he said, but soon after the explosions, he was singled out by internet sleuths as looking suspicious. Federal authorities passed around images of Barhoun, attempting to learn more information about him, sources told ABC News.
Today The New York Post ran a story featuring a picture of Barhoun and another man circled in red, but said it was unclear if they were the same as two potential suspects spotted by law enforcement Wednesday.
When he saw the front page story, with the headline "Bag Men," Barhoun said, "It's the worst feeling that I can possibly feel… I'm only 17."
COMPLETE COVERAGE: Terror at the Boston Marathon
ABC News producers found Barhoun through social media and spoke to him today at his home. He said he had actually wanted to run the race and when he couldn't, decided to watch.
Barhoun's younger brother, who declined to be identified, said that it made his mother "sick and upset" that her son had been connected to the tragedy.
"It made her think he had done something wrong," the younger brother said. "My brother is not the bomber."
Federal law enforcement sources told ABC News they are no longer seeking information about Barhoun or the other man in the photo published in the Post.
Have a tip related to this or another investigation? CLICK HERE to send it in.
The teenage boy authorities once investigated as possibly being connected to the Boston Marathon bombing told ABC News today he was shocked to see his face pop up on television and all over social media.
Salah Barhoun, 17, said he went to the police yesterday to clear his name after he found himself tagged in pictures online. He had just gone to watch the race, he said, but soon after the explosions, he was singled out by internet sleuths as looking suspicious. Federal authorities passed around images of Barhoun, attempting to learn more information about him, sources told ABC News.
Today The New York Post ran a story featuring a picture of Barhoun and another man circled in red, but said it was unclear if they were the same as two potential suspects spotted by law enforcement Wednesday.
When he saw the front page story, with the headline "Bag Men," Barhoun said, "It's the worst feeling that I can possibly feel… I'm only 17."
COMPLETE COVERAGE: Terror at the Boston Marathon
ABC News producers found Barhoun through social media and spoke to him today at his home. He said he had actually wanted to run the race and when he couldn't, decided to watch.
Barhoun's younger brother, who declined to be identified, said that it made his mother "sick and upset" that her son had been connected to the tragedy.
"It made her think he had done something wrong," the younger brother said. "My brother is not the bomber."
Federal law enforcement sources told ABC News they are no longer seeking information about Barhoun or the other man in the photo published in the Post.
Have a tip related to this or another investigation? CLICK HERE to send it in.
Breaking: Police Confirm Infowars Photos of Boston Suspects
(Posted by Powers)
Photos of Boston bombing suspects sent to Infowars by Anonymous that caused a huge stir on the Internet yesterday after being posted by the Drudge Report have been confirmed by police to be the two men sought for questioning, but the authorities and the media remain mute on other photos which show what are likely to be employees of a private security firm carrying large black backpacks at the scene of the explosion.
“In the photos being distributed by law-enforcement officials among themselves, one of the men is carrying a blue duffel bag. The other is wearing a black backpack in the first photo, taken at 10:53 a.m., but it is not visible in the second, taken at 12:30 p.m,” reports the New York Post.
The photo is identical to an image we posted yesterday on Infowars.com showing two middle eastern looking individuals, one with a white baseball cap and another wearing a blue jacket.
“The attached photos are being circulated in an attempt to identify the individuals highlighted therein,” said an e-mail obtained by The Post. “Feel free to pass this around to any of your fellow agents elsewhere.”
However, there has been no mention whatsoever in official law enforcement or media circles of separate images taken from the finish line of the Boston Marathon which show one Caucasian and another middle eastern looking individual wearing identical clothing, carrying large black backpacks and speaking into cellphones moments after the bombing.
Another image shows what could be the same Caucasian man or a third identically dressed individual with a black object in his hand after the blast.
The two or three men’s behavior and demeanor in the photos clearly suggests that they are engaged in some kind of drill, which would correlate with eyewitness reports from marathon runners that bomb drills were taking place at the start of the event and that participants were told to remain calm.
Police have denied that any such drills took place or that any prior intelligence indicated an attack.
The men appear to be wearing Navy Seal attire which is also the same standard issue Craft International uniform used by the private security firm.
The media seemed primed to blame the the attacks on white right-wing extremists, but as soon as the photos of the middle eastern looking individuals emerged, reports that an arrest had been made were retracted and the FBI cancelled a planned press conference.
The whole official narrative behind the Boston bombings is now in complete disarray as a result of these photos being released yesterday on the Internet.
There seems to be no rational explanation for why two employees of a private security firm would be on the scene of the blasts carrying large black backpacks similar to those used in the actual attack unless they were involved in some kind of drill that paralleled the real bombing.
The FBI should be attempting to uncover the identity of these individuals as an urgent priority and the mainstream media should be all over the story, but instead we have heard nothing but silence.
In addition, following an unscheduled meeting between President Barack Obama and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal yesterday, it was subsequently revealed that one of the early suspects in the bombing, Saudi national Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, was being deported from the United States on “national security” grounds.
This has prompted some to speculate that the Obama administration is covering up Saudi terrorist involvement in the attack, another reason why yesterday’s supposed unveiling of the bombing suspect was derailed.
“That’s very interesting because this is the way things are done with Saudi Arabia. You don’t arrest their citizens,” terrorism expert Steve Emerson told Fox News last night. “You deport them, because they don’t want them to be embarrassed and that’s the way we appease them.”
*********************
(Posted by Powers)
Photos of Boston bombing suspects sent to Infowars by Anonymous that caused a huge stir on the Internet yesterday after being posted by the Drudge Report have been confirmed by police to be the two men sought for questioning, but the authorities and the media remain mute on other photos which show what are likely to be employees of a private security firm carrying large black backpacks at the scene of the explosion.
“In the photos being distributed by law-enforcement officials among themselves, one of the men is carrying a blue duffel bag. The other is wearing a black backpack in the first photo, taken at 10:53 a.m., but it is not visible in the second, taken at 12:30 p.m,” reports the New York Post.
The photo is identical to an image we posted yesterday on Infowars.com showing two middle eastern looking individuals, one with a white baseball cap and another wearing a blue jacket.
“The attached photos are being circulated in an attempt to identify the individuals highlighted therein,” said an e-mail obtained by The Post. “Feel free to pass this around to any of your fellow agents elsewhere.”
However, there has been no mention whatsoever in official law enforcement or media circles of separate images taken from the finish line of the Boston Marathon which show one Caucasian and another middle eastern looking individual wearing identical clothing, carrying large black backpacks and speaking into cellphones moments after the bombing.
Another image shows what could be the same Caucasian man or a third identically dressed individual with a black object in his hand after the blast.
The two or three men’s behavior and demeanor in the photos clearly suggests that they are engaged in some kind of drill, which would correlate with eyewitness reports from marathon runners that bomb drills were taking place at the start of the event and that participants were told to remain calm.
Police have denied that any such drills took place or that any prior intelligence indicated an attack.
The men appear to be wearing Navy Seal attire which is also the same standard issue Craft International uniform used by the private security firm.
The media seemed primed to blame the the attacks on white right-wing extremists, but as soon as the photos of the middle eastern looking individuals emerged, reports that an arrest had been made were retracted and the FBI cancelled a planned press conference.
The whole official narrative behind the Boston bombings is now in complete disarray as a result of these photos being released yesterday on the Internet.
There seems to be no rational explanation for why two employees of a private security firm would be on the scene of the blasts carrying large black backpacks similar to those used in the actual attack unless they were involved in some kind of drill that paralleled the real bombing.
The FBI should be attempting to uncover the identity of these individuals as an urgent priority and the mainstream media should be all over the story, but instead we have heard nothing but silence.
In addition, following an unscheduled meeting between President Barack Obama and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal yesterday, it was subsequently revealed that one of the early suspects in the bombing, Saudi national Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, was being deported from the United States on “national security” grounds.
This has prompted some to speculate that the Obama administration is covering up Saudi terrorist involvement in the attack, another reason why yesterday’s supposed unveiling of the bombing suspect was derailed.
“That’s very interesting because this is the way things are done with Saudi Arabia. You don’t arrest their citizens,” terrorism expert Steve Emerson told Fox News last night. “You deport them, because they don’t want them to be embarrassed and that’s the way we appease them.”
*********************
US Senate: Will back Israeli attack on Iran
Foreign Relations Committee of the US Senate votes in favor of resolution stipulating that US will support Israel in case it was forced to take military action against Iran
Yitzhak Benhorin Published: 04.17.13, 01:00 / Israel News
(Posted by Dank)
WASHINGTON — Members of the US Senate's Foreign Relations Committee have adopted "Senate Resolution 65," according to which the US will support Israel in case it is compelled to take military action and actualize its right to self defense in the face of an Iranian threat.
The resolution stipules that Israel will enjoy Washington's diplomatic, economic and military aid.
According to the resolution, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez and Sen. Lindsey Graham, the US's policy is to halt Iranian nuclear ambitions.
Senate Resolution 65 has successfully gained the support of 70 of the 100 senators.
In a statement issued by AIPAC it was noted that “The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has sent a very clear and enormously important message of solidarity with Israel against the Iranian nuclear threat—which endangers American, Israeli, and international security.”
PresidentBarack Obamasent his holiday wishes to Israel on its 65thIndependence Day, stating: "On this date 65 years ago, the Jewish people realized their dream of the ages – to be masters of their fate in their own sovereign state."
"The strong and prosperous Israel we see today proves Herzl's vision – 'if you will it, it is no dream," the US president added
(Posted by Dank)
WASHINGTON — Members of the US Senate's Foreign Relations Committee have adopted "Senate Resolution 65," according to which the US will support Israel in case it is compelled to take military action and actualize its right to self defense in the face of an Iranian threat.
The resolution stipules that Israel will enjoy Washington's diplomatic, economic and military aid.
According to the resolution, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez and Sen. Lindsey Graham, the US's policy is to halt Iranian nuclear ambitions.
Senate Resolution 65 has successfully gained the support of 70 of the 100 senators.
In a statement issued by AIPAC it was noted that “The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has sent a very clear and enormously important message of solidarity with Israel against the Iranian nuclear threat—which endangers American, Israeli, and international security.”
PresidentBarack Obamasent his holiday wishes to Israel on its 65thIndependence Day, stating: "On this date 65 years ago, the Jewish people realized their dream of the ages – to be masters of their fate in their own sovereign state."
"The strong and prosperous Israel we see today proves Herzl's vision – 'if you will it, it is no dream," the US president added
April 9, 2013
·From the desk of cavnews and other blogs
(Posted by Dank)
According to Tom Heneghan’s Intelligence Briefing’s Blog, Kim Jong-un has just received a load of money from the USA.
“It can now be reported that a P140 U.S. aircraft cargo plane left Langley, Virginia at 3:30 p.m. EST destination North Korea.
“The aircraft contains $3 BILLION that was made available by the Dallas branch of the German Commerz Bank.
“The $3 BILLION will be delivered directly to North Korea dictator Kim Jong-un by U.S. officials.”
“The U.S. team is headed by former Clinton Administration official, North Korean bag man Bill Richardson.
“Kim is receiving these bribe funds in exchange for his playing a role in a scripted ‘black op’ that is designed to effect worldwide financial markets.”
"I'll go, I've always wanted to see meet Kim Jong-un!"
(Posted by Dank)
According to Tom Heneghan’s Intelligence Briefing’s Blog, Kim Jong-un has just received a load of money from the USA.
“It can now be reported that a P140 U.S. aircraft cargo plane left Langley, Virginia at 3:30 p.m. EST destination North Korea.
“The aircraft contains $3 BILLION that was made available by the Dallas branch of the German Commerz Bank.
“The $3 BILLION will be delivered directly to North Korea dictator Kim Jong-un by U.S. officials.”
“The U.S. team is headed by former Clinton Administration official, North Korean bag man Bill Richardson.
“Kim is receiving these bribe funds in exchange for his playing a role in a scripted ‘black op’ that is designed to effect worldwide financial markets.”
"I'll go, I've always wanted to see meet Kim Jong-un!"
04-03-13
Dank Da Tank
CNN has provided some projections of what a war might look like be between the Koreans. if you don't know what the D.M.Z. is; it is lince from coast to coast across the Korean peninsula where the weapons or war for the north point south, and the south points weapons of war at the north.
CNN has provided some projections of what a war might look like be between the Koreans. if you don't know what the D.M.Z. is; it is lince from coast to coast across the Korean peninsula where the weapons or war for the north point south, and the south points weapons of war at the north.
|
1/21/13 HAPPY BIRTHDAY M.L.K.
|
|
1/19/13 (Posted by Cheeba)
UPDATED: Jurors Not Allowed to Consider First Amendment in Political Dissent Case January 17, 2013 By Rebecca Kemble
Earlier today, Dane County Circuit Court Judge Julie Genovese approved the State of Wisconsin’s motion to prohibit Jason Huberty from giving instructions to a jury relating to the First Amendment. His case stems from an alleged administrative rule violation for holding a banner that said “Solidarity” in the Capitol rotunda on September 10, 2012. Huberty asserts this action constitutes protected First Amendment speech.
In her ruling, Judge Genovese said, “Determining interpretation of administrative rules is a question of law.” She further elaborated, “Whether or not (the rule) is constitutional, it is a question of constitutional fact” which must be raised and decided directly by the court. She reasoned that, “instructing the jury on standards they will not apply will only confuse the jury.”
Commenting on the ruling, Huberty’s attorney, former Kenosha County District Attorney Robert Jambois said, “If we raise a constitutional issue directly, it will get kicked up to the State Supreme Court,” which he characterized as, “hostile territory for people who are not conservative Republicans.”
In her ruling, Judge Genovese said, “Determining interpretation of administrative rules is a question of law.” She further elaborated, “Whether or not (the rule) is constitutional, it is a question of constitutional fact” which must be raised and decided directly by the court. She reasoned that, “instructing the jury on standards they will not apply will only confuse the jury.”
Commenting on the ruling, Huberty’s attorney, former Kenosha County District Attorney Robert Jambois said, “If we raise a constitutional issue directly, it will get kicked up to the State Supreme Court,” which he characterized as, “hostile territory for people who are not conservative Republicans.”
1/14/13Obama Administration Seeks Approval to Test Anthrax Vaccine on Children
A public meeting of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues has been scheduled for Monday and Tuesday, January 14-15, to be held at the University of Miami Hospital Seminar Center, Florida: The stated topic for discussion is “ethical issues associated with the development of medical countermeasures for children.” Under US Law, research involving greater than minimal risk and no prospect of direct benefit to individual [child] subjects, is prohibited in healthy children. (45 CFR 46, subpart D).WHOSE CHILDREN WILL BE EXPOSED TO THE SERIOUS RISKS OF THE ANTHRAX VACCINE–WITHOUT ANY POTENTIAL BENEFIT FOR THEM? WHOSE CHILDREN WILL BE USED AS HUMAN GUINEA PIGS? http://www.biothrax.com/prescribinginformation_biothrax_us.pdf http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/902/9/ http://www.naturalnews.com/024624_flu_the_shot.html Senior Merck Scientist Admits Spreading Cancer & AIDS From Vaccines
This is an interview that was censored for obvious reasons. Dr. Maurice Hilleman who was a senior vaccine scientist at Merck reveals the real story behind AIDS and the SV40 virus which causes cancer and how they have been deliberately put in vaccines to infect people.
|
Prominent American blogger and computer prodigy Aaron Swartz, who spoke against US President Barack Obama’s “kill list” and cyber attacks against Iran, has been found dead in New York.
Aaron H. Swartz (November 8, 1986 – January 11, 2013) was an American computer programmer, writer, archivist, political organizer, and Internet activist.
On January 6, 2011, Swartz was arrested in connection with systematic downloading of academic journal articles from JSTOR, which became the subject of a federal investigation. Swartz disliked the fact that JSTOR charged to access articles but, rather than compensating the authors, JSTOR compensated publishers instead. JSTOR's fees limited access to works produced by America's colleges and universities.On January 11, 2013, Swartz was found dead in his Crown Heights, Brooklyn, apartment, where he had apparently hanged himself. |
11/30/12 (Posted by Cheeba)
CHATTER: Nuclear Christmas – false flag in America to blame on Iran
There are strong confirmations that one or more nuclear weapons, known to have been stolen but kept from the public to “prevent panic,” may well be deployed in American cities by extremist elements with probable ties to a foreign intelligence agency.
This scenario was the basis of the television show “Jericho” several years ago. However, this time there are real culprits and real motivations, both the overthrow of the government of the United States and the naming of Iran as a “scapegoat.”
The plot has been tracked to groups within the Pentagon, several government agencies and wealthy and powerful extremist backers of Netanyahu and, in particular, the “Gulf Cartel” operating from Mexico that has penetrated nearly all levels of government, law enforcement and the military across the country.
Using surprisingly direct language, President Obama has officially confirmed this conspiracy.
Six days ago, the President of the United States, on his official public website, issued a warning about “government insiders” who were planning “violent acts” against the “government and the nation.”
This scenario was the basis of the television show “Jericho” several years ago. However, this time there are real culprits and real motivations, both the overthrow of the government of the United States and the naming of Iran as a “scapegoat.”
The plot has been tracked to groups within the Pentagon, several government agencies and wealthy and powerful extremist backers of Netanyahu and, in particular, the “Gulf Cartel” operating from Mexico that has penetrated nearly all levels of government, law enforcement and the military across the country.
Using surprisingly direct language, President Obama has officially confirmed this conspiracy.
Six days ago, the President of the United States, on his official public website, issued a warning about “government insiders” who were planning “violent acts” against the “government and the nation.”
Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich take on White House over legality of drone strikes
Democratic Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich, Republican Texas Rep. Ron Paul and Democratic New Jersey Rep. Rush Holt Jr. are challenging the Obama administration to release documents it uses to legally justify drone strikes overseas. If passed by Congress, their “resolution of inquiry” would require Attorney General Eric Holder to “transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, any documents and legal memoranda in the Attorney General’s possession relating to the practice of targeted killing of United States citizens and targets abroad.”
11/18/12
WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:
Formally request that the Senate take action on S. 202
Audit the Fed
Whereas, the American taxpayer has been made liable for over $16 trillion in loans and bailouts; and
Whereas, the Federal Reserve consistently refuses to fully disclose the details of said lending; and
Whereas, S 202, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, would require a comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve for the first time in its history and would provide accountability to all Americans as to how their money is being spent; and
Whereas, you personally promised the American people that your administration would stand for openness and transparency in government.
Therefore Mr. President, We the people here undersigned urge you to formally ask Senate Majority Leader Reid to take action and bring the S. 202 to the Senate floor as quickly as possible for a full roll call vote.
Created: Nov 14, 2012
Issues: Budget and Taxes, Economy, Government Reform
//petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/formally-request-senate-take-action-s-202-audit-fed/cgKQKNrv
THIS PETITION CURRENTLY HAS ONLY 1,674 SIGNATURES IT NEEDS 23,326 MORE BY DECEMBER 14, 2012
Whereas, the Federal Reserve consistently refuses to fully disclose the details of said lending; and
Whereas, S 202, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, would require a comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve for the first time in its history and would provide accountability to all Americans as to how their money is being spent; and
Whereas, you personally promised the American people that your administration would stand for openness and transparency in government.
Therefore Mr. President, We the people here undersigned urge you to formally ask Senate Majority Leader Reid to take action and bring the S. 202 to the Senate floor as quickly as possible for a full roll call vote.
Created: Nov 14, 2012
Issues: Budget and Taxes, Economy, Government Reform
//petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/formally-request-senate-take-action-s-202-audit-fed/cgKQKNrv
THIS PETITION CURRENTLY HAS ONLY 1,674 SIGNATURES IT NEEDS 23,326 MORE BY DECEMBER 14, 2012
Treat marijuana like alcohol throughout the US by enacting HR 2306: "Ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2011."
American voters want marijuana legalized. Marijuana is no worse than alcohol and is likely a safer and healthier alternative for the individual user and public at large.
Marijuana prohibition enforcement costs U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars each year. Federal regulation will produce billions of dollars in annual revenue and create jobs.
American citizens should no longer be arrested for noncriminal behavior. Federal regulation will combat discrimination by stopping the racial biased arrests and prosecutions of minorities. Medical patients should have the option of choosing safer and less expensive prescriptions.
Minors should be protected from the "gateway effect" because drug dealers often sell more than marijuana and do not ask for IDs.
Please enact HR 2306.
Created: Nov 18, 2012
Issues: Civil Rights and Liberties, Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement, Human Rights//petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/treat-marijuana-alcohol-throughout-us-enacting-hr-2306-ending-federal-marijuana-prohibition-act-2011/KVdSpGP3?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl
THIS PETITION HAS 70 SIGNATURES IT NEEDS 24,930 MORE SIGNATURES BY DECEMBER 18, 2012
Marijuana prohibition enforcement costs U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars each year. Federal regulation will produce billions of dollars in annual revenue and create jobs.
American citizens should no longer be arrested for noncriminal behavior. Federal regulation will combat discrimination by stopping the racial biased arrests and prosecutions of minorities. Medical patients should have the option of choosing safer and less expensive prescriptions.
Minors should be protected from the "gateway effect" because drug dealers often sell more than marijuana and do not ask for IDs.
Please enact HR 2306.
Created: Nov 18, 2012
Issues: Civil Rights and Liberties, Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement, Human Rights//petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/treat-marijuana-alcohol-throughout-us-enacting-hr-2306-ending-federal-marijuana-prohibition-act-2011/KVdSpGP3?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl
THIS PETITION HAS 70 SIGNATURES IT NEEDS 24,930 MORE SIGNATURES BY DECEMBER 18, 2012
Different Groups Join Together Outside Of BBC Headquarters to Protest One-Sided Coverage on Gaza
By JG Vibes theintelhub.com November 18, 2012
For years the mainstream media has failed to present a view of events in the Middle East that is even remotely accurate or balanced. During the most recent conflicts in Gaza, the western media has been a propaganda mouthpiece for Israel, as many expected, based on what has been seen in the past. Since the siege on Gaza begin to escalate this week there have been protests popping up all over the world in support of the Palestinian people who are caught in the middle of this brutal, and totally orchestrated conflict.One of these protests happened to be in front of the BBC headquarters, in answer to the propaganda that the network has been generating, not just now, but in the past as well...
11/15/12
In an over 45 minute long marathon address on the House floor yesterday, Congressman Ron Paul said farewell after a 36 year long career in politics, including 23 years in office. And he did so with a stark warning to lovers of liberty everywhere.
11/14/12
Reassessing Flu Shots as the Season Draws Near
By RONI CARYN RABIN
...It’s flu-shot season, and public health officials are urging everyone over 6 months of age to get one. Many businesses provide on-site flu shots, and some hospitals have told staff members that they have to wear masks if they do not get the vaccine. By 2020, United States health leaders want 80 percent of the population to get yearly shots...
...For vaccine manufacturers, it’s a bonanza:Influenza shots — given every year — are a multibillion-dollar global business...
“We have overpromoted and overhyped this vaccine,” said Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, as well as its Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance. “It does not protect as promoted. It’s all a sales job: it’s all public relations.”
...For vaccine manufacturers, it’s a bonanza:Influenza shots — given every year — are a multibillion-dollar global business...
“We have overpromoted and overhyped this vaccine,” said Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, as well as its Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance. “It does not protect as promoted. It’s all a sales job: it’s all public relations.”
11/11/12
this veterans day thank a veteran by reading these articles
On Veterans Day, don't thank us—join us in demanding justice... November11, 2012 By Michael Prysner & Kevin Baker
Vets head to Ft. Lewis: "You don't have to go to Afghanistan"A deployment to stop a deployment to Afghanistan: OCTOBER 4, 2012
Life and limb for a slow-motion retreat...Politicians, generals sacrifice lives of soldiers and Afghans to save face: OCTOBER 5, 2012
Debate snubs troops: The longest war in under two minutes Afghanistan war barely touched on in final presidential debate OCTOBER 24, 2012
Vets head to Ft. Lewis: "You don't have to go to Afghanistan"A deployment to stop a deployment to Afghanistan: OCTOBER 4, 2012
Life and limb for a slow-motion retreat...Politicians, generals sacrifice lives of soldiers and Afghans to save face: OCTOBER 5, 2012
Debate snubs troops: The longest war in under two minutes Afghanistan war barely touched on in final presidential debate OCTOBER 24, 2012
11/8/12
California fails to pass genetically modified foods labeling initiative
By Alexandra Sifferlin, TIME.com
updated 7:13 AM EST, Thu November 8, 2012
After the polls closed, Prop 37 -- also known as the "Right To Know" initiative to require labeling of foods that have been genetically modified -- failed to pass. If approved, California would have been the first state to require such labeling for foods sold in the state, and would have prohibited products containing genetically modified ingredients to be labeled or marketed as "natural."Prop 37 supporters argued that citizens have the right to know what's in their food and make educated decisions on what to feed their families, especially since long-term health effects are hazy. They wanted to see labeling, according to the ballot initiative, either on the front or back of packages "if the food is made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways."
Opponents from the biotech industry and Big Ag companies like Monsanto called the labeling deceptive and argued it would stigmatize foods that scientific evidence shows is not harmful. They also estimated that the cost of the labeling requirement would trickle down to California households, forcing families to pay $400 more in grocery bills each year. As TIME's EcoCentric noted, however, that figure, which became a highly debated part of the campaign, assumes manufacturers would be replacing currently unlabeled genetically modified (GM) products rather than slapping new labels on them.
Opponents from the biotech industry and Big Ag companies like Monsanto called the labeling deceptive and argued it would stigmatize foods that scientific evidence shows is not harmful. They also estimated that the cost of the labeling requirement would trickle down to California households, forcing families to pay $400 more in grocery bills each year. As TIME's EcoCentric noted, however, that figure, which became a highly debated part of the campaign, assumes manufacturers would be replacing currently unlabeled genetically modified (GM) products rather than slapping new labels on them.
US Government Backs UN Arms Treaty and Bombs Yemen Hours After Obama Win
By JG Vibes
theintelhub.com
November 8, 2012
...One of the main selling points of the treaty is that it will apparently keep guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists, but as we saw with the fast and furious scandal, as well as with the long list of government gunrunning scandals before that, western governments are the biggest supplier of arms to criminals and terrorists.With that being said, any measure that these governments take to control the sale or possession of firearms is a Trojan horse, designed to disarm the population....This particular strike has killed three people, who mainstream news sources have marked as terrorists, however proof of these claims have been unsubstantiated.
According to one mainstream source:
“Three terrorists, including local al-Qaida commander Adnan al- Qathi who is wanted for bombing the U.S. embassy in Sanaa in late 2008, were confirmed killed Wednesday night in a Yemeni-U.S. joint airstrike operation which targeted the militants’ vehicle near Sayyan village outside the capital Sanaa,”
It is likely that a restriction of freedoms in terms of gun control and an increase in drone attacks will continue under President Obama’s second term. It is just as likely that these policies would have occurred under Romney as well...
http://theintelhub.com/2012/11/08/us-government-backs-un-arms-treaty-and-bombs-yemen-hours-after-obama-win/
According to one mainstream source:
“Three terrorists, including local al-Qaida commander Adnan al- Qathi who is wanted for bombing the U.S. embassy in Sanaa in late 2008, were confirmed killed Wednesday night in a Yemeni-U.S. joint airstrike operation which targeted the militants’ vehicle near Sayyan village outside the capital Sanaa,”
It is likely that a restriction of freedoms in terms of gun control and an increase in drone attacks will continue under President Obama’s second term. It is just as likely that these policies would have occurred under Romney as well...
http://theintelhub.com/2012/11/08/us-government-backs-un-arms-treaty-and-bombs-yemen-hours-after-obama-win/
11/2/12
Who really controls world events from behind-the-scene?
Years of extensive research and investigation have gone into this massively documented work. In this 624 page, large format book, Fritz Springmeier discloses mind-boggling facts and never before revealed truths about the top Illuminati dynasties.
You’ll learn of the secretive, Chinese Li family, which operates with impunity in the U.S.A. and around the world.
Along the way you’ll find out,
Discover the amazing role these bloodlines have played - and are now wielding - in human history, with family names such as:
Contents
Years of extensive research and investigation have gone into this massively documented work. In this 624 page, large format book, Fritz Springmeier discloses mind-boggling facts and never before revealed truths about the top Illuminati dynasties.
You’ll learn of the secretive, Chinese Li family, which operates with impunity in the U.S.A. and around the world.
Along the way you’ll find out,
- why President John F. Kennedy and actress Grace Kelly were killed
- who created the United Nations
- who controls the two major U.S. political parties
- how the Rothschilds invented and control modern-day Israel
- who secretly founded false religions such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses,
Discover the amazing role these bloodlines have played - and are now wielding - in human history, with family names such as:
Contents
- The Astor Bloodline
- The Bundy Bloodline
- The Collins Bloodline
- The DuPont Bloodline
- The Freeman Bloodline
- The Kennedy Bloodline
- The Li Bloodline
- The Onassis Bloodline
- The Reynolds Bloodline
- The Rockefeller Bloodline
- The Rothschild Bloodline
- The Russell Bloodline
- The Van Duyn Bloodline
- Merovingian (European Royal Families)
- The Top 13 Families & The Mormon Leadership (Moriah & The Mormon Leadership)
- Disney - Uno de Los Mayores Engaños de Todos los Tiempos
- The Disney Bloodline
- The Krupp Bloodline
- The McDonald Bloodline
- Alex Jones' Interview "Bloodlines of The Illuminati" Author Fritz Springmeier - 2011 - Video
- CFR - Council on Foreign Relations - Main File
- Estos Mataron a Kennedy! - Reportaje, A Un Golpe De Estado
- Kennedy and The Nazis
- Merovingios - Los Reyes Perdidos - Main File
- New World Order - Main File
- Rockefeller Internationalism - Main File
- Teflón - 'Only by DuPont' (Solo por DuPont)
- The Biggest Secret - The Book
- The Bilderberg Group - Main File
- The Biological Basis of Elitism and "The Divine Right" Rule
- The House of Rothschild - Main File
- The Majestic Project / MJ-12 - Main File
- The Illuminati Formula to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Control Slave
- The Trilateral Commission - Main File
10/30/12
10/25/2012
- Sylvester Stallone’s Oldest Son Another Victim Of Big Pharma?
- How Big Pharma got Americans hooked on anti-psychotic drugs.
- More than 25 percent of children now on chronic prescription medications
- Big Pharma May be Handed Blanket Immunity for All Drug Side Effects, Deaths
- FDA approved Big Pharma drugs without effectiveness data
- NIU Shooter On a “Cocktail” of Dangerous Pharam Drugs
- Big Pharma’s Crooked Crusade to Push Pills on Little Kids
- BMJ admits antipsychotic drugs kill far more people than terrorism
- Whitney Houston cause of death cover-up? Coroner changes story, blames cocaine, not pharmaceuticals
- Concerns Raised About Combat Troops Using Psychotropic Drugs
- Big Pharma to begin microchipping drugs
- Legal Drugs Kill Far More Than Illegal
10/24/2012 TOP STORIES TODAY!
STILL IMPORTANT!
- BPA Found In Soft Drink Cans
- Study links sugary soft drinks to pancreas cancer
- Fluoride: Don’t Drink the Water
- Energy future: why countries must now pursue cheap and abundant energy
- How fizzy drinks can harm an unborn child
- Study: Children drink same amount of soda regardless of whether or not it is available at school
- Possible deaths from H1N1 vaccine reported in Sweden
- Deaths in China from Flu Vaccination
- Swine Flu deaths – What are the real numbers?
- Mother ‘died after drinking 18 pints of Coca-Cola a day ‘
- US Troop Deaths in Afghan War Under Obama Now Twice That Under Bush
- Monster Bluefin Tuna Found Near Australia, Suspected Fukushima Radiation
10/23/2012
Is Superman the next Drudge? Clark Kent quits newspapers in latest issue
Even Clark Kent can see through the writing on the wall when it comes to the newspaper industry.
In the next issue of DC comics’ “Superman,” due out on Wednesday, the superhero’s alter ego will eschew being a mild-mannered reporter, presumably to become a snarky blogger, when he quits his post at the Daily Planet.
“This is really what happens when a 27-year-old guy is behind a desk and he has to take instruction from a larger conglomerate with concerns that aren’t really his own,” Superman writer Scott Lobdell said to USA Today.
“Superman is arguably the most powerful person on the planet, but how long can he sit at his desk with someone breathing down his neck and treating him like the least important person in the world?” Lobdell said.
In the comic’s current story line, the Daily Planet's editor-in-chief has soured on Kent because he is not getting enough front page scoops on his beat of covering all things Superman. To make matters worse, head honcho Morgan Edge has been giving Kent a hard time, which causes him to go from mild-to-wild-mannered, quitting on the spot in the middle of the newsroom before launching into a diatribe about the state of journalism.
“This is not the first time in DC Comics history that Clark Kent has left the Planet, and this time the resignation reflects present-day issues – the balance of journalism vs. entertainment, the role of new media, the rise of the citizen journalist, etc.," DC Comics said in a written statement to FoxNews.com. "Over the next several issues, readers will enjoy the many surprises in store for Clark, as the 'H'el on Earth' storyline unfolds."
Lobdell suggested Kent would "come into his own in the next few years as far as being a guy who takes to the Internet and to the airwaves and starts speaking an unvarnished truth."
So don't expect Kent to be filling out job applications.
"He is more likely to start the next Huffington Post or the next Drudge Report than he is to go find someone else to get assignments or draw a paycheck from," Lobdell told USA Today.
Clark’s career shift is the latest in an ongoing initiative by DC comics to update their cast of characters for the modern day.
The New York-based publisher re-launched all its titles over a year ago with “the New 52” line of titles, which shook up the worlds of most the characters in the brand. The Superman title alone saw Clark Kent and his long time love, Lois Lane, no longer married.
And while he still has feelings for her, a romance bloomed between Superman and Wonder Woman when they shared a kiss in a recent issue of "Justice League."
In the next issue of DC comics’ “Superman,” due out on Wednesday, the superhero’s alter ego will eschew being a mild-mannered reporter, presumably to become a snarky blogger, when he quits his post at the Daily Planet.
“This is really what happens when a 27-year-old guy is behind a desk and he has to take instruction from a larger conglomerate with concerns that aren’t really his own,” Superman writer Scott Lobdell said to USA Today.
“Superman is arguably the most powerful person on the planet, but how long can he sit at his desk with someone breathing down his neck and treating him like the least important person in the world?” Lobdell said.
In the comic’s current story line, the Daily Planet's editor-in-chief has soured on Kent because he is not getting enough front page scoops on his beat of covering all things Superman. To make matters worse, head honcho Morgan Edge has been giving Kent a hard time, which causes him to go from mild-to-wild-mannered, quitting on the spot in the middle of the newsroom before launching into a diatribe about the state of journalism.
“This is not the first time in DC Comics history that Clark Kent has left the Planet, and this time the resignation reflects present-day issues – the balance of journalism vs. entertainment, the role of new media, the rise of the citizen journalist, etc.," DC Comics said in a written statement to FoxNews.com. "Over the next several issues, readers will enjoy the many surprises in store for Clark, as the 'H'el on Earth' storyline unfolds."
Lobdell suggested Kent would "come into his own in the next few years as far as being a guy who takes to the Internet and to the airwaves and starts speaking an unvarnished truth."
So don't expect Kent to be filling out job applications.
"He is more likely to start the next Huffington Post or the next Drudge Report than he is to go find someone else to get assignments or draw a paycheck from," Lobdell told USA Today.
Clark’s career shift is the latest in an ongoing initiative by DC comics to update their cast of characters for the modern day.
The New York-based publisher re-launched all its titles over a year ago with “the New 52” line of titles, which shook up the worlds of most the characters in the brand. The Superman title alone saw Clark Kent and his long time love, Lois Lane, no longer married.
And while he still has feelings for her, a romance bloomed between Superman and Wonder Woman when they shared a kiss in a recent issue of "Justice League."
10/23/2012
State GOP Files Complaint Against Obama Campaigners At CSU
FORT COLLINS, Colo. (CBS4) – Early voting only got under way on Monday and already a complaint has been filed.
Colorado Republicans say Democrats wrongly offered Colorado State University students free pizza and T-shirts in exchange for voting.
Colorado state law says campaigners have to be 100 feet from a polling place, but there is some grey area, particularly when a polling place is inside a large public building like CSU’s Lory Student Center.
The Colorado Republican Committee sent a letter to the Larimer County clerk alleging wrongdoing by campaigners for the Democratic Party during the first day of early voting on the CSU campus.
“Operatives for the Democratic Party, or for what appears to be the Obama campaign, had set up a table located right outside the Lory Student Center, which is where one of the early vote locations is,” Colorado GOP Chairman Ryan Call said.
Photos were provided by the Colorado Republican Party that they say demonstrates their concern. They claim the Democratic organizers were too close to the entrance of the polling place and were violating state laws.
“They were essentially offering students and passers-by T-shirts and campaign T-shirts with the impression, very clearly, that you had to go vote first, and if you voted, then they would give you free T-shirts and free pizza,” Call said.
Students involved with the Obama campaign wouldn’t comment, but CBS4 received a statement from the Colorado Democratic Party.
“This is a hypocritical charge … the party that has spent over half a million dollars on a firm accused of voter fraud across the country should join us in encouraging people to vote instead of making frivolous complaints,” the statement said.
“It’s a balancing act, there’s no question about it,” Larimer County Clerk and Recorder Scott Doyle said. “There were some banners put up, there were some signs put up, and there was some question about locations of all of those; and so mid-morning I got involved and we were able to work that out throughout today.”
Doyle says he was able to talk to both sides and the issue was resolved.
“When I did have discussion with campaigners, they were very accommodating. They didn’t want to cause any problems and they wanted gather their stuff up and move back to where they should have been, or where we thought they should have been, and didn’t want to be imposing illegally on anyone,” Doyle said.
As a general rule Doyle is asking campaigners to stay 100 feet away from any door that accesses the Lory Student Center. He also says he expects more of those types of issues to arise as Election Day nears in such a hotly contested presidential race.
Colorado Republicans say Democrats wrongly offered Colorado State University students free pizza and T-shirts in exchange for voting.
Colorado state law says campaigners have to be 100 feet from a polling place, but there is some grey area, particularly when a polling place is inside a large public building like CSU’s Lory Student Center.
The Colorado Republican Committee sent a letter to the Larimer County clerk alleging wrongdoing by campaigners for the Democratic Party during the first day of early voting on the CSU campus.
“Operatives for the Democratic Party, or for what appears to be the Obama campaign, had set up a table located right outside the Lory Student Center, which is where one of the early vote locations is,” Colorado GOP Chairman Ryan Call said.
Photos were provided by the Colorado Republican Party that they say demonstrates their concern. They claim the Democratic organizers were too close to the entrance of the polling place and were violating state laws.
“They were essentially offering students and passers-by T-shirts and campaign T-shirts with the impression, very clearly, that you had to go vote first, and if you voted, then they would give you free T-shirts and free pizza,” Call said.
Students involved with the Obama campaign wouldn’t comment, but CBS4 received a statement from the Colorado Democratic Party.
“This is a hypocritical charge … the party that has spent over half a million dollars on a firm accused of voter fraud across the country should join us in encouraging people to vote instead of making frivolous complaints,” the statement said.
“It’s a balancing act, there’s no question about it,” Larimer County Clerk and Recorder Scott Doyle said. “There were some banners put up, there were some signs put up, and there was some question about locations of all of those; and so mid-morning I got involved and we were able to work that out throughout today.”
Doyle says he was able to talk to both sides and the issue was resolved.
“When I did have discussion with campaigners, they were very accommodating. They didn’t want to cause any problems and they wanted gather their stuff up and move back to where they should have been, or where we thought they should have been, and didn’t want to be imposing illegally on anyone,” Doyle said.
As a general rule Doyle is asking campaigners to stay 100 feet away from any door that accesses the Lory Student Center. He also says he expects more of those types of issues to arise as Election Day nears in such a hotly contested presidential race.
10/23/2012
Chicago Store-Owner Labeled ‘Racist’ For Anti-Obama Business Sign
CHICAGO (CBS) — An outspoken and controversial shopkeeper who has been a fixture in Lincoln Square for the past dozen years has been targeted by a vandal.
75-year-old Sam Wolfson owns String a Strand bead shop.
And he wears his heart on his sleeve. His political leanings – anti-Obama – are posted on his store window.
Like his handwritten signs that say: “Romney, if you want to be president, you have to say this: ‘If I’m elected, I will not bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia” and “Obama, I built this business working 7 days a week, you didn’t.”
“I walked in,” he said. “I was coming to work and in lipstick it had a sign, ‘Racist.’ I’m not a racist. My wife is Spanish. Come on.”
He has since cleaned up the graffiti.
WBBM Newsradio spoke with some passersby on Lincoln Avenue.
“I don’t necessarily disagree with the sentiments by the lipstick vandal,” one person said. “But I don’t condone such actions.”
Wolfson says it’s just symptomatic of a contentious election year.
75-year-old Sam Wolfson owns String a Strand bead shop.
And he wears his heart on his sleeve. His political leanings – anti-Obama – are posted on his store window.
Like his handwritten signs that say: “Romney, if you want to be president, you have to say this: ‘If I’m elected, I will not bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia” and “Obama, I built this business working 7 days a week, you didn’t.”
“I walked in,” he said. “I was coming to work and in lipstick it had a sign, ‘Racist.’ I’m not a racist. My wife is Spanish. Come on.”
He has since cleaned up the graffiti.
WBBM Newsradio spoke with some passersby on Lincoln Avenue.
“I don’t necessarily disagree with the sentiments by the lipstick vandal,” one person said. “But I don’t condone such actions.”
Wolfson says it’s just symptomatic of a contentious election year.
10/22/2012
Saman Mohammadi
Infowars.com
Totalitarian governments operate very predictably and foolishly. Their propaganda is so over-the-top absurd that even the most gullible and uneducated members of their permanently indoctrinated populations start becoming more and more skeptical of official government accounts of reality.
The Fascist Bureau of Intimidation, the institution that was responsible for the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and other American political reformers in the 1960s, is in the habit of abusing its authority in the post-9/11 paranoid political environment in the United States.
Last week, the FBI arrested a young man from Bangladesh named Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis for planning to blow up the New York Federal Reserve Bank. It all sounds very scary, but the FBI had everything under control. Innocent lives were never at stake because the manipulative FBI created the fake plot and supplied Nafis with a fake bomb.
Other related articles on topic;
Kurt Nimmo reported on October 17 in an article called,
“FBI Entraps Witless Patsy in Federal Reserve Bombing Plot”:
Alex Newman writes in his article,
“FBI Celebrates Foiling Its Own Terror Plot, Again”
The Fascist Bureau of Intimidation, the institution that was responsible for the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and other American political reformers in the 1960s, is in the habit of abusing its authority in the post-9/11 paranoid political environment in the United States.
Last week, the FBI arrested a young man from Bangladesh named Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis for planning to blow up the New York Federal Reserve Bank. It all sounds very scary, but the FBI had everything under control. Innocent lives were never at stake because the manipulative FBI created the fake plot and supplied Nafis with a fake bomb.
Other related articles on topic;
Kurt Nimmo reported on October 17 in an article called,
“FBI Entraps Witless Patsy in Federal Reserve Bombing Plot”:
Alex Newman writes in his article,
“FBI Celebrates Foiling Its Own Terror Plot, Again”
10/15/2012
PATRIOT FREEDOM NEWS
Naming Names: Your Real Government When dark deeds unfold, point the finger in this direction.
by Tony Cartalucci
This is your real government; they transcend elected administrations, they permeate every political party, and they are responsible for nearly every aspect of the average American and European's way of life. When the "left" is carrying the torch for two "Neo-Con" wars, starting yet another based on the same lies, peddled by the same media outlets that told of Iraqi WMD's, the world has no choice, beyond profound cognitive dissonance, but to realize something is wrong.
What's wrong is a system completely controlled by a corporate-financier oligarchy with financial, media, and industrial empires that span the globe. If we do not change the fact that we are helplessly dependent on these corporations that regulate every aspect of our nation politically, and every aspect of our lives personally, nothing else will ever change.
International Crisis Group
www.crisisgroup.org
Background: While the International Crisis Group (ICG) claims to be "committed to preventing and resolving deadly conflict," the reality is that they are committed to offering solutions crafted well in advance to problems they themselves have created in order to perpetuate their own corporate agenda.
Brookings Institute
www.brookings.edu
Background: Within the library of the Brookings Institute you will find the blueprints for nearly every conflict the West has been involved with in recent memory. What's more is that while the public seems to think these crises spring up like wildfires, those following the Brookings' corporate funded studies and publications see these crises coming years in advance. These are premeditated, meticulously planned conflicts that are triggered to usher in premeditated, meticulously planned solutions to advance Brookings' corporate supporters, who are numerous.
Council on Foreign Relations
www.cfr.org
Background & Notable Membership: A better question would be, who isn't in the Council on Foreign Relations? Nearly every self-serving career politician, their advisers, and those populating the boards of the Fortune 500 are CFR members. Many of the books, magazine articles, and newspaper columns we read are written by CFR members, along with reports, similar to Brookings Institute that dictate, verbatim, the legislation that ends up before the West's lawmakers.
The Chatham House
www.chathamhouse.org.uk
Background & Membership: The UK's Chatham House, like the CFR and the Brookings Institute in America, has an extensive membership and is involved in coordinated planning, perception management, and the execution of its corporate membership's collective agenda.
Conclusion
These organizations represent the collective interests of the largest corporations on earth. They not only retain armies of policy wonks and researchers to articulate their agenda and form a consensus internally, but also use their massive accumulation of unwarranted influence in media, industry, and finance to manufacture a self-serving consensus internationally.
To believe that this corporate-financier oligarchy would subject their agenda and fate to the whims of the voting masses is naive at best. They have painstakingly ensured that no matter who gets into office, in whatever country, the guns, the oil, the wealth and the power keep flowing perpetually into their own hands. Nothing vindicates this poorly hidden reality better than a "liberal" Nobel Peace Prize wearing president, dutifully towing forward a myriad of "Neo-Con" wars, while starting yet another war in Libya.
Likewise, no matter how bloody your revolution is, if the above equation remains unchanged, and the corporate bottom lines left unscathed, nothing but the most superficial changes will have been made, and as is the case in Egypt with International Crisis Group stooge Mohamed ElBaradei worming his way into power, things may become substantially worse.
The real revolution will commence when we identify the above equation as the true brokers of power and when we begin systematically removing our dependence on them, and their influence on us from our daily lives. The global corporate-financier oligarchy needs us, we do not need them, independence from them is the key to our freedom.
For more information on alternative economics, getting self-sufficient and moving on without the parasitic, incompetent, globalist oligarchs:
The Lost Key to Real Revolution
Boycott the Globalists
Alternative Economics
Self-Sufficiency
What's wrong is a system completely controlled by a corporate-financier oligarchy with financial, media, and industrial empires that span the globe. If we do not change the fact that we are helplessly dependent on these corporations that regulate every aspect of our nation politically, and every aspect of our lives personally, nothing else will ever change.
International Crisis Group
www.crisisgroup.org
Background: While the International Crisis Group (ICG) claims to be "committed to preventing and resolving deadly conflict," the reality is that they are committed to offering solutions crafted well in advance to problems they themselves have created in order to perpetuate their own corporate agenda.
Brookings Institute
www.brookings.edu
Background: Within the library of the Brookings Institute you will find the blueprints for nearly every conflict the West has been involved with in recent memory. What's more is that while the public seems to think these crises spring up like wildfires, those following the Brookings' corporate funded studies and publications see these crises coming years in advance. These are premeditated, meticulously planned conflicts that are triggered to usher in premeditated, meticulously planned solutions to advance Brookings' corporate supporters, who are numerous.
Council on Foreign Relations
www.cfr.org
Background & Notable Membership: A better question would be, who isn't in the Council on Foreign Relations? Nearly every self-serving career politician, their advisers, and those populating the boards of the Fortune 500 are CFR members. Many of the books, magazine articles, and newspaper columns we read are written by CFR members, along with reports, similar to Brookings Institute that dictate, verbatim, the legislation that ends up before the West's lawmakers.
The Chatham House
www.chathamhouse.org.uk
Background & Membership: The UK's Chatham House, like the CFR and the Brookings Institute in America, has an extensive membership and is involved in coordinated planning, perception management, and the execution of its corporate membership's collective agenda.
Conclusion
These organizations represent the collective interests of the largest corporations on earth. They not only retain armies of policy wonks and researchers to articulate their agenda and form a consensus internally, but also use their massive accumulation of unwarranted influence in media, industry, and finance to manufacture a self-serving consensus internationally.
To believe that this corporate-financier oligarchy would subject their agenda and fate to the whims of the voting masses is naive at best. They have painstakingly ensured that no matter who gets into office, in whatever country, the guns, the oil, the wealth and the power keep flowing perpetually into their own hands. Nothing vindicates this poorly hidden reality better than a "liberal" Nobel Peace Prize wearing president, dutifully towing forward a myriad of "Neo-Con" wars, while starting yet another war in Libya.
Likewise, no matter how bloody your revolution is, if the above equation remains unchanged, and the corporate bottom lines left unscathed, nothing but the most superficial changes will have been made, and as is the case in Egypt with International Crisis Group stooge Mohamed ElBaradei worming his way into power, things may become substantially worse.
The real revolution will commence when we identify the above equation as the true brokers of power and when we begin systematically removing our dependence on them, and their influence on us from our daily lives. The global corporate-financier oligarchy needs us, we do not need them, independence from them is the key to our freedom.
For more information on alternative economics, getting self-sufficient and moving on without the parasitic, incompetent, globalist oligarchs:
The Lost Key to Real Revolution
Boycott the Globalists
Alternative Economics
Self-Sufficiency
|
Attention Disorder or Not, Pills to Help in School
Psychiatrists are now giving children in poor neighborhoods Adderall, a dangerous stimulant, by making false diagnoses of ADHD, or no diagnoses at all. Their aim? To “promote social justice,” to improve academic performance in school. When Dr. Michael Anderson hears about his low-income patients struggling in elementary school, he usually gives them a taste of some powerful medicine: Adderall. The rationale is, the drugged kids will now be able to compete with children from wealthier families who attend better schools. Although A.D.H.D is the diagnosis Dr. Anderson makes, he calls the disorder “made up” and “an excuse” to prescribe the pills to treat what he considers the children’s true ill — poor academic performance in inadequate schools. Dr. Ramesh Raghavan, goes even further with this chilling comment:“We as a society have been unwilling to invest in very effective nonpharmaceutical interventions for these children and their families, “We are effectively forcing local community psychiatrists to use the only tool at their disposal [to “level the playing field” in low-income neighborhoods], which is psychotropic medicine.” Dr. Anderson is one of the more outspoken proponents of an idea that is gaining interest among some physicians.Dr. Anderson’s instinct, he said, is that of a “social justice thinker” who is “evening the scales a little bit.” He said that the children he sees with academic problems are essentially “mismatched with their environment” — square pegs chafing the round holes of public education. Because their families can rarely afford behavior-based therapies like tutoring and family counseling, he said, medication becomes the most reliable and pragmatic way to redirect the student toward success. Dr. Nancy Rappaport, a child psychiatrist in Cambridge, Mass., “We are seeing this more and more. We are using a chemical straitjacket." Some experts see little harm in a responsible physician using A.D.H.D. medications to help a struggling student. Others — even among the many like Dr. Rappaport who praise the use of stimulants as treatment for classic A.D.H.D. — fear that doctors are exposing children to unwarranted physical and psychological risks. In what sense are the ADHD drugs “social justice?” The reality is, they are chemical warfare. Licensed predators are preying on the poor. Some side-effects to these drugs include: • Paranoid delusions • Paranoid psychosis • Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis • Activation of psychotic symptoms • Toxic psychosis • Visual hallucinations • Auditory hallucinations • Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences • Effects pathological thought processes • Extreme withdrawal • Terrified affect • Started screaming • Aggressiveness • Insomnia • Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect amphetamine-like effects • Psychic dependence • High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug • Decreased REM sleep • When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia • Convulsions • Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse. http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-mind-control-engineers-now-drugging-children-for-social-justice/ http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/09/health/attention-disorder-or-not-children-prescribed-pills-to-help-in-school.html?pagewanted=3&_r=3&smid=tw-nytimes&partner=rss&emc=rss |
10/12/12
Biden contradicts State Department on Benghazi security
Vice President Joe Biden claimed that the administration wasn't aware of requests for more security in Libya before the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi during Thursday night's debate, contradicting three State Department officials and the former head of diplomatic security in Libya.
"We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there," Biden said.
In fact, two security officials who worked for the State Department in Libya at the time testified Thursday that they repeatedly requested more security and two State Department officials admitted they had denied those requests.
"All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources," the top regional security officer in Libya over the summer, Eric Nordstrom, testified. "In those conversations, I was specifically told [by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb] ‘You cannot request an SST extension.' I determined I was told that because there would be too much political cost. We went ahead and requested it anyway.
Nordstrom was so critical of the State Department's reluctance to respond to his calls for more security that he said, "For me, the Taliban is on the inside of the building."
"We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met," testified Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, a Utah National Guardsman who was leading a security team in Libya until August.
House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) released the unclassified cables containing those requests.
Paul Ryan pointed out the testimony to Biden during the debate. Ryan also erred when he criticized the State Department for assigning Marines to protect the ambassador in France but not Amb. Chris Stevens, who died in Benghazi on Sept. 11.
"Our ambassador in Paris has a marine detachment guarding him, shouldn't we have a Marine detachment guarding our ambassador in Benghazi?," Ryan said.
According to the U.S. Embassy Paris website, there is a Marine Security Guard Detachment in the embassy, but they are there primarily to protect classified information and are not part of the ambassador's personal security detail.
"The mission of the Marine Security Guards is to provide internal security at designated United States Diplomatic and Consular facilities to prevent the compromise of classified material and equipment which, if compromised, would cause serious damage to the national security interests of the United States; and to provide protection for U.S. citizens and property within the principal buildings of the Mission," the website reads, noting that in certain situations the Marines might be in a position to protect the chief of mission.
Ryan also criticized President Barack Obama for attributing the Benghazi attack to an anti-Islam video and he referred to comments today by Obama campaign spokesman Stephanie Cutter, who said the Benghazi issue was only politically relevant because the Romney-Ryan campaign was pushing it.
Biden accused Romney of spouting off about the Benghazi attack before knowing all the facts and he pledged that the administration would pursue the investigation to wherever it leads.
"We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there," Biden said.
In fact, two security officials who worked for the State Department in Libya at the time testified Thursday that they repeatedly requested more security and two State Department officials admitted they had denied those requests.
"All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources," the top regional security officer in Libya over the summer, Eric Nordstrom, testified. "In those conversations, I was specifically told [by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb] ‘You cannot request an SST extension.' I determined I was told that because there would be too much political cost. We went ahead and requested it anyway.
Nordstrom was so critical of the State Department's reluctance to respond to his calls for more security that he said, "For me, the Taliban is on the inside of the building."
"We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met," testified Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, a Utah National Guardsman who was leading a security team in Libya until August.
House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) released the unclassified cables containing those requests.
Paul Ryan pointed out the testimony to Biden during the debate. Ryan also erred when he criticized the State Department for assigning Marines to protect the ambassador in France but not Amb. Chris Stevens, who died in Benghazi on Sept. 11.
"Our ambassador in Paris has a marine detachment guarding him, shouldn't we have a Marine detachment guarding our ambassador in Benghazi?," Ryan said.
According to the U.S. Embassy Paris website, there is a Marine Security Guard Detachment in the embassy, but they are there primarily to protect classified information and are not part of the ambassador's personal security detail.
"The mission of the Marine Security Guards is to provide internal security at designated United States Diplomatic and Consular facilities to prevent the compromise of classified material and equipment which, if compromised, would cause serious damage to the national security interests of the United States; and to provide protection for U.S. citizens and property within the principal buildings of the Mission," the website reads, noting that in certain situations the Marines might be in a position to protect the chief of mission.
Ryan also criticized President Barack Obama for attributing the Benghazi attack to an anti-Islam video and he referred to comments today by Obama campaign spokesman Stephanie Cutter, who said the Benghazi issue was only politically relevant because the Romney-Ryan campaign was pushing it.
Biden accused Romney of spouting off about the Benghazi attack before knowing all the facts and he pledged that the administration would pursue the investigation to wherever it leads.
Wash. Could Become First State To OK Pot Sales
Wash. Could Become First State To OK Pot Sales October 11, 2012 3:18 PM Share this View Comments File photo of marijuana. (Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)
Filed under News Related tags legalize pot, Marijuana, pot, pot sales, Trending SEATTLE (AP) — Washington state is on the verge of becoming the first in the nation to let adults over 21 buy taxed, inspected marijuana at state-licensed shops.
It might not clear up more than a decade of confusion that resulted from the state’s medical marijuana law, or reverse the proliferation of dispensaries. But supporters say passing Initiative 502 on Nov. 6 could make drug laws more reasonable, prevent thousands of arrests a year, and bring Washington hundreds of millions of dollars to help pay for schools, health care and basic government services. It could also set up a big fight with the federal government.
Voters in Colorado and Oregon are considering similar measures. But based on polls, Washington’s initiative might stand the best chance of passing. The measure has drawn slim organized opposition and gained support from some former federal law enforcement officers. The campaign has raised $4.1 million.
“There’s a real disconnect with pot,” said Brooke Thompson, a retired teacher from Bainbridge Island who found marijuana innocuous when she smoked it as a young adult. “It’s been criminalized and criminals are making money on it. The state could be making money on it, and using the taxes to go into education. It seems like a win-win, and it would be nice for Washington to be the testing ground on this.”
“Testing ground” is the right phrase. Washington could become a laboratory in easing the nation’s drug war, which has cost more than $1 trillion and hundreds of thousands of lives in the past 40 years while doing little to dent demand.
Just as likely, it could bring on a protracted fight with the federal government. Marijuana remains illegal under U.S. law, and when state and federal laws conflict, federal law takes precedence. The Justice Department has kept mum, but if I-502 passes, many lawyers believe the DOJ is likely to try to block the law on the grounds that it frustrates the Controlled Substances Act.
That could leave just part of the initiative standing: decriminalization of up to an ounce of pot under state law, with no way to buy it legally, and a driving-under-the-influence standard that opponents consider arbitrarily strict.
The federal government could also prosecute growers or retailers licensed under the law, seize Washington’s new marijuana revenues as proceeds of illicit drug deals, or withhold money from the state.
Nevertheless, I-502′s sponsors, including former Seattle U.S. Attorney John McKay, Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes and travel writer Rick Steves, say the measure has been drafted to withstand a federal challenge. Alison Holcomb, I-502′s campaign manager, said at a recent debate that she would sit down with representatives of the federal government to explain how the measure could complement, not frustrate, federal efforts.
The initiative, promoted by New Approach Washington, would create a system of state-licensed growers, processors and stores, and would impose a 25 percent excise tax at each stage. Adults 21 and over could buy up to an ounce of dried marijuana; one pound of marijuana-infused product in solid form, such as brownies; or 72 ounces of marijuana-infused liquids. The cannabis would be subject to testing to establish its THC content.
Sales wouldn’t begin immediately. The state Liquor Control Board would have a year to establish guidelines.
Holcomb, who concedes that marijuana is addictive for some, says I-502 would allow authorities to treat it as a public health issue, as has been effective in reducing tobacco use.
“We don’t arrest adults for tobacco use to try to keep kids from using it,” she said.
State revenue experts have estimated that I-502 could bring in as much as $1.9 billion in the next five years. Some of the money would be dedicated to the state general fund, while other portions would be devoted to health care, education and substance-abuse prevention.
If the initiative passes:
—Public use or display of marijuana would be barred.
—No marijuana facilities could be located near schools, day cares, parks or libraries.
—Employers would still be able to fire workers who test positive for pot.
—It would remain illegal to privately grow marijuana for recreational use, though medical patients could still grow their own or designate someone to grow it for them.
—It would be illegal to drive with more than 5 nanograms of THC, the active ingredient of cannabis, per milliliter of blood, if the driver is over 21; for those under 21, there would be a zero tolerance policy.
There would be no legal effect on medical marijuana dispensaries. However, it could have a political effect, Holcomb said. If recreational pot sales are allowed, prosecutors and investigators might take a more critical look at whether those operations are truly serving sick people.
Organized opposition comes from a group of medical marijuana patients who object to the DUI standard and say that if people can’t grow their own, it’s not really legalization at all.
Other public health and some law enforcement officials also oppose it, even if they haven’t raised any money.
Mitch Barker, executive director of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, said his organization is concerned about increasing availability of marijuana, especially for teens, and the difficulty of enforcing the DUI provisions.
The initiative’s biggest financial contributor is Progressive Insurance founder Peter Lewis, who has given more than $1.5 million. Lewis also contributed to Washington’s medical marijuana campaigns in 1997 and 1998.
Other donors include New York-based Drug Policy Action and the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington.
The former head of the FBI in Seattle and both candidates for King County sheriff have voiced support.
Voters like Terry Lavender, a retired 61-year-old from Woodinville who used pot decades ago, say they’re intrigued by the idea of being able to walk into a state licensed store and buy marijuana.
“I enjoy a bit of scotch, I enjoy a beer, so maybe I would,” Lavender says. “But that’s not my motivation for doing this. My motivation is to stop locking people up.”
(© Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
Filed under News Related tags legalize pot, Marijuana, pot, pot sales, Trending SEATTLE (AP) — Washington state is on the verge of becoming the first in the nation to let adults over 21 buy taxed, inspected marijuana at state-licensed shops.
It might not clear up more than a decade of confusion that resulted from the state’s medical marijuana law, or reverse the proliferation of dispensaries. But supporters say passing Initiative 502 on Nov. 6 could make drug laws more reasonable, prevent thousands of arrests a year, and bring Washington hundreds of millions of dollars to help pay for schools, health care and basic government services. It could also set up a big fight with the federal government.
Voters in Colorado and Oregon are considering similar measures. But based on polls, Washington’s initiative might stand the best chance of passing. The measure has drawn slim organized opposition and gained support from some former federal law enforcement officers. The campaign has raised $4.1 million.
“There’s a real disconnect with pot,” said Brooke Thompson, a retired teacher from Bainbridge Island who found marijuana innocuous when she smoked it as a young adult. “It’s been criminalized and criminals are making money on it. The state could be making money on it, and using the taxes to go into education. It seems like a win-win, and it would be nice for Washington to be the testing ground on this.”
“Testing ground” is the right phrase. Washington could become a laboratory in easing the nation’s drug war, which has cost more than $1 trillion and hundreds of thousands of lives in the past 40 years while doing little to dent demand.
Just as likely, it could bring on a protracted fight with the federal government. Marijuana remains illegal under U.S. law, and when state and federal laws conflict, federal law takes precedence. The Justice Department has kept mum, but if I-502 passes, many lawyers believe the DOJ is likely to try to block the law on the grounds that it frustrates the Controlled Substances Act.
That could leave just part of the initiative standing: decriminalization of up to an ounce of pot under state law, with no way to buy it legally, and a driving-under-the-influence standard that opponents consider arbitrarily strict.
The federal government could also prosecute growers or retailers licensed under the law, seize Washington’s new marijuana revenues as proceeds of illicit drug deals, or withhold money from the state.
Nevertheless, I-502′s sponsors, including former Seattle U.S. Attorney John McKay, Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes and travel writer Rick Steves, say the measure has been drafted to withstand a federal challenge. Alison Holcomb, I-502′s campaign manager, said at a recent debate that she would sit down with representatives of the federal government to explain how the measure could complement, not frustrate, federal efforts.
The initiative, promoted by New Approach Washington, would create a system of state-licensed growers, processors and stores, and would impose a 25 percent excise tax at each stage. Adults 21 and over could buy up to an ounce of dried marijuana; one pound of marijuana-infused product in solid form, such as brownies; or 72 ounces of marijuana-infused liquids. The cannabis would be subject to testing to establish its THC content.
Sales wouldn’t begin immediately. The state Liquor Control Board would have a year to establish guidelines.
Holcomb, who concedes that marijuana is addictive for some, says I-502 would allow authorities to treat it as a public health issue, as has been effective in reducing tobacco use.
“We don’t arrest adults for tobacco use to try to keep kids from using it,” she said.
State revenue experts have estimated that I-502 could bring in as much as $1.9 billion in the next five years. Some of the money would be dedicated to the state general fund, while other portions would be devoted to health care, education and substance-abuse prevention.
If the initiative passes:
—Public use or display of marijuana would be barred.
—No marijuana facilities could be located near schools, day cares, parks or libraries.
—Employers would still be able to fire workers who test positive for pot.
—It would remain illegal to privately grow marijuana for recreational use, though medical patients could still grow their own or designate someone to grow it for them.
—It would be illegal to drive with more than 5 nanograms of THC, the active ingredient of cannabis, per milliliter of blood, if the driver is over 21; for those under 21, there would be a zero tolerance policy.
There would be no legal effect on medical marijuana dispensaries. However, it could have a political effect, Holcomb said. If recreational pot sales are allowed, prosecutors and investigators might take a more critical look at whether those operations are truly serving sick people.
Organized opposition comes from a group of medical marijuana patients who object to the DUI standard and say that if people can’t grow their own, it’s not really legalization at all.
Other public health and some law enforcement officials also oppose it, even if they haven’t raised any money.
Mitch Barker, executive director of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, said his organization is concerned about increasing availability of marijuana, especially for teens, and the difficulty of enforcing the DUI provisions.
The initiative’s biggest financial contributor is Progressive Insurance founder Peter Lewis, who has given more than $1.5 million. Lewis also contributed to Washington’s medical marijuana campaigns in 1997 and 1998.
Other donors include New York-based Drug Policy Action and the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington.
The former head of the FBI in Seattle and both candidates for King County sheriff have voiced support.
Voters like Terry Lavender, a retired 61-year-old from Woodinville who used pot decades ago, say they’re intrigued by the idea of being able to walk into a state licensed store and buy marijuana.
“I enjoy a bit of scotch, I enjoy a beer, so maybe I would,” Lavender says. “But that’s not my motivation for doing this. My motivation is to stop locking people up.”
(© Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
10/11/12 GMO Scientists Furious at Growing Public Awareness
The debate as to whether or not genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are causing serious health issues like infertility and even death is proclaimed as ‘heated’ and ‘inconclusive’ by the mainstream media. Scientists working behind the scenes appear to acknowledge the reality of their effects. In one such communication a very angry biotech scientist proclaimed its ‘awesome’ if GMOs are causing mass infertility and death. The biotech scientist who works for a well-known firm, known as ‘Ed’ explains how he thinks it’s absolutely ‘awesome’ that GMOs are contributing to infertility, as he believes the world is overpopulated and people need to stop having children. For years these corporations have been hiding behind biotech-funded phony science and high level politicians with deep ties to leading bitoech corporations. Those who create GMOs and unleash them on the public without proper warning are ‘traitors to humanity’.
10/11/12 If only people with these beliefs would do us all a favor and start with themselves
10/10/12
Swiss Study Shows 147 Technocratic “Super Entities” Rule the World
Susanne Posel
Infowars.com
October 10, 2012
The Swiss Federal Institute (SFI) in Zurich released a study entitled “The Network of Global Corporate Control” that proves a small consortiums of corporations – mainly banks – run the world. A mere 147 corporations which form a “super entity” have control of 40% of the world’s wealth; which is the real economy. These mega-corporations are at the center of the global economy. The banks found to be most influential include:
• Barclays
• Goldman Sachs
• JPMorgan Chase & Co
• Vanguard Group
• UBS
• Deutsche Bank
• Bank of New York Melon Corp
• Morgan Stanley
• Bank of America Corp
• Société Générale
However as the connections to the controlling groups are networked throughout the world, they become the catalyst for global financial collapse.
James Glattfelder, complex systems theorist at the SFI explains: “In effect, less than one per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network.”
Using mathematic models normally applied to natural systems, the researchers analyzed the world’s economy. Their data was taken from Orbis 2007, a database which lists 37 million corporations and investors. The evidence showed that the world’s largest corporations are interconnected to all other companies and their professional decisions affect all markets across the globe.
George Sudihara, complex systems expert for SFI claims that this phenomenon is a common structure that could be found in nature. Comparing the manufactured reality of the financial markets to the ecosystems of the planet, Sudihara says that although the 147 corporations that rule the world through influence and interconnectedness are no more harmful than the natural cycles of our weather or animal kingdoms.
Yet because of the facts presented in the study, the financial crash of 2008 can be traced back to these tightly-knit networks. Future disasters can also be projected based on this analysis because of the “connectedness” of these influential entities which are only 147 corporations.
It is suggested the global capitalism could be a useful tool to make the markets more stable by simply acquiescing to control by the technocrats. The world’s transitional corporations (TNCs) guide the flow of all economies through influence and manipulation which created a structure of economic power. Most corporations are guided by the shareholders who use the companies to wield incredible power over the shift of economic consciousness. And the behavior of the system reflects the direction taken by those who fund the super entities.
Assumed by many that there was a complex architecture to the global economic power that caused financial systems to ebb and flow or crash and burn is not a scientific fact as evidenced in this study.
As the banking cartels force countries in the EuroZone into sovereign debt, there is a weakening of the many multi-national corporations around the world. Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase have financially gained while stocks are being unloaded in other markets.
This sovereign land-grab by the central banking cartels across Europe is mirrored in a recent Goldman Sachs report: “The more the Spanish administration indulges domestic political interests … the more explicit conditionality is likely to be demanded.” In other words the technocrats working for the Zionists are acquiring each country in the EuroZone.
The European Central Bankers agreed to give any nation in the Euro-Zone a bailout if they agreed to hand over the country to them under the guise of “new rules and conditions when applying for assistance.”
As America drifts downstream toward economic implosion, the Federal Reserve headed by Ben Bernanke has chosen a different approach. They unveiled QE3 last week as a pump and dump scheme to prop up the US dollar by printing cash that is backed by nothing, while purchasing the mortgage-backed securities from the same banks that created the scandal and acquiring land in a massive land-grab; the likes of which have never been seen in the US.
Simultaneously, the BRICs nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) are buying gold to back their fiat currencies to avoid being caught up in the destruction of the technocrats as they march toward one world currency. BRICs have become the anti-thesis to the banking cartels of the Zionist regime.
As these nations pair with Middle Eastern countries like Iran to trade gold for petrol instead of the US dollar as the global reserve currency, the Obama administration has begun a propaganda campaign against China involving a manufactured cyber-threat.
In Iran, the terrorist factions that do the bidding of the Zionists to topple governments by inciting fake revolutions have been deployed to Iran to stir-up trouble and blame the failing Ra-il which is being strategically destroyed by sanctions placed on the nation by the US. The American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) coerced the US Congress to pass HR 1905 which further tighten the economic noose around Iran for the benefit of the Zionist-controlled Israeli government.
In April of this year, the BRICs nations met to agree upon a strategy that would liberate the countries of the world from the grip of the technocrats. The BRICs countries are pushing for peace, but not through force and occupation of other countries to obtain this goal.
Vladimir Putin, President of Russia had this to say about the United Nations and their obvious attempts at global governance through usurpation of powers over countries. “One of the priorities of BRICs for the years to come should be the strengthening and key role of the UN’s Security Council in maintaining international peace and security. And also ensuring that the UN is not used as a cover for regime change and unilateral actions to resolve conflict situations.”
A joint BRICs bank was discussed with vigor. It would serve as an alternative to central banks that abuse their power at the expense of nations worldwide. They hope to replace the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. The IMF and World Bank are alarmed by this move and highly disapprove of it.
This is not shocking, considering that the central banks play a game of printing fiat that has no precious metals backing the paper.
Over 180 countries have signed onto the BRICs agreement as evidenced in their declaration. While the global Elite still hold power over the G5 countries, the rest of the world is standing up, severing their ties and making plans for a new world without them.
Susanne Posel’s website is Occupy Corporatism.
Infowars.com
October 10, 2012
The Swiss Federal Institute (SFI) in Zurich released a study entitled “The Network of Global Corporate Control” that proves a small consortiums of corporations – mainly banks – run the world. A mere 147 corporations which form a “super entity” have control of 40% of the world’s wealth; which is the real economy. These mega-corporations are at the center of the global economy. The banks found to be most influential include:
• Barclays
• Goldman Sachs
• JPMorgan Chase & Co
• Vanguard Group
• UBS
• Deutsche Bank
• Bank of New York Melon Corp
• Morgan Stanley
• Bank of America Corp
• Société Générale
However as the connections to the controlling groups are networked throughout the world, they become the catalyst for global financial collapse.
James Glattfelder, complex systems theorist at the SFI explains: “In effect, less than one per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network.”
Using mathematic models normally applied to natural systems, the researchers analyzed the world’s economy. Their data was taken from Orbis 2007, a database which lists 37 million corporations and investors. The evidence showed that the world’s largest corporations are interconnected to all other companies and their professional decisions affect all markets across the globe.
George Sudihara, complex systems expert for SFI claims that this phenomenon is a common structure that could be found in nature. Comparing the manufactured reality of the financial markets to the ecosystems of the planet, Sudihara says that although the 147 corporations that rule the world through influence and interconnectedness are no more harmful than the natural cycles of our weather or animal kingdoms.
Yet because of the facts presented in the study, the financial crash of 2008 can be traced back to these tightly-knit networks. Future disasters can also be projected based on this analysis because of the “connectedness” of these influential entities which are only 147 corporations.
It is suggested the global capitalism could be a useful tool to make the markets more stable by simply acquiescing to control by the technocrats. The world’s transitional corporations (TNCs) guide the flow of all economies through influence and manipulation which created a structure of economic power. Most corporations are guided by the shareholders who use the companies to wield incredible power over the shift of economic consciousness. And the behavior of the system reflects the direction taken by those who fund the super entities.
Assumed by many that there was a complex architecture to the global economic power that caused financial systems to ebb and flow or crash and burn is not a scientific fact as evidenced in this study.
As the banking cartels force countries in the EuroZone into sovereign debt, there is a weakening of the many multi-national corporations around the world. Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase have financially gained while stocks are being unloaded in other markets.
This sovereign land-grab by the central banking cartels across Europe is mirrored in a recent Goldman Sachs report: “The more the Spanish administration indulges domestic political interests … the more explicit conditionality is likely to be demanded.” In other words the technocrats working for the Zionists are acquiring each country in the EuroZone.
The European Central Bankers agreed to give any nation in the Euro-Zone a bailout if they agreed to hand over the country to them under the guise of “new rules and conditions when applying for assistance.”
As America drifts downstream toward economic implosion, the Federal Reserve headed by Ben Bernanke has chosen a different approach. They unveiled QE3 last week as a pump and dump scheme to prop up the US dollar by printing cash that is backed by nothing, while purchasing the mortgage-backed securities from the same banks that created the scandal and acquiring land in a massive land-grab; the likes of which have never been seen in the US.
Simultaneously, the BRICs nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) are buying gold to back their fiat currencies to avoid being caught up in the destruction of the technocrats as they march toward one world currency. BRICs have become the anti-thesis to the banking cartels of the Zionist regime.
As these nations pair with Middle Eastern countries like Iran to trade gold for petrol instead of the US dollar as the global reserve currency, the Obama administration has begun a propaganda campaign against China involving a manufactured cyber-threat.
In Iran, the terrorist factions that do the bidding of the Zionists to topple governments by inciting fake revolutions have been deployed to Iran to stir-up trouble and blame the failing Ra-il which is being strategically destroyed by sanctions placed on the nation by the US. The American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) coerced the US Congress to pass HR 1905 which further tighten the economic noose around Iran for the benefit of the Zionist-controlled Israeli government.
In April of this year, the BRICs nations met to agree upon a strategy that would liberate the countries of the world from the grip of the technocrats. The BRICs countries are pushing for peace, but not through force and occupation of other countries to obtain this goal.
Vladimir Putin, President of Russia had this to say about the United Nations and their obvious attempts at global governance through usurpation of powers over countries. “One of the priorities of BRICs for the years to come should be the strengthening and key role of the UN’s Security Council in maintaining international peace and security. And also ensuring that the UN is not used as a cover for regime change and unilateral actions to resolve conflict situations.”
A joint BRICs bank was discussed with vigor. It would serve as an alternative to central banks that abuse their power at the expense of nations worldwide. They hope to replace the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. The IMF and World Bank are alarmed by this move and highly disapprove of it.
This is not shocking, considering that the central banks play a game of printing fiat that has no precious metals backing the paper.
Over 180 countries have signed onto the BRICs agreement as evidenced in their declaration. While the global Elite still hold power over the G5 countries, the rest of the world is standing up, severing their ties and making plans for a new world without them.
Susanne Posel’s website is Occupy Corporatism.
10/10/12
UH O: OBAMA ATTENDED WEDDING OF VP DEBATE MODERATOR
President Barack Obama was a guest at the 1991 wedding of ABC senior foreign correspondent and vice presidential debate moderator Martha Raddatz, The Daily Caller has learned. Obama and groom Julius Genachowski, whom Obama would later tap to head the Federal Communications Commission, were Harvard Law School classmates at the time and members of the Harvard Law Review.
After TheDC made preliminary inquiries Monday to confirm Obama’s attendance at the wedding, ABC leaked a pre-emptive statement to news outlets including Politico and The Daily Beast Tuesday, revealing what may have been internal network pressure felt just days before Raddatz was scheduled to moderate the one and only vice-presidential debate Thursday night.
Both Politico and The Daily Beast jumped to ABC and Raddatz’s defense. The Huffington Post, a liberal news outlet, joined them shortly thereafter, while calling “unusual” ABC’s attempt to kill the story before it gained wide circulation.
Genachowski — called “Jay” at the time of his wedding, sources told TheDC — and Raddatz would go on to have a son together before their divorce in 1997. They have both since remarried to other people.
A source who attended the 1991 wedding told TheDC that Obama was also a guest there, and remembered that a man by the name of “Barry Obama” was among the guests dancing at the reception. (RELATED: Marital, personal ties link Obama administration to Commission on Presidential Debates)
In August, The Daily Caller first connected Genachowski, an Obama appointee, to Raddatz following her selection as the vice presidential debate moderator by the left-leaning Commission on Presidential Debates. That debate, between Congressman Paul Ryan and Vice President Joe Biden, will take place Thursday night at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky.
Carol Platt Liebau, a political commentator who was a Harvard Law Review colleague of Genachowski and Obama, wrote that “despite being a year below both men on the Review and not close personal friends with either of them,” she remembered Genachowski and Raddatz’s relationship as “quite public” during those days, and that “Raddatz visited Boston frequently.”
Genachowski’s friendship with Obama would continue through the campaign trail in 2008 and into the White House: He aggressively fundraised for Obama in 2008 as a campaign bundler, and served on the presidential transition team before winning his appointment to chair the FCC.
On Monday evening ABC spokesman David Ford grudgingly confirmed Obama’s attendance at the wedding, after shielding Raddatz in August by declining to comment when The Daily Caller first reported the story.
“This is absurd,” Ford said, in the same statement now circulated by ABC’s media allies on the left.
Obama, Ford wrote, “attended their wedding over two decades ago along with nearly the entire Law Review, many of whom went onto successful careers, including some in the Bush administration,” he said without providing a specific number of Harvard Law Review employees to verify the statement.
When pressed further on Tuesday for a specific number of Harvard Law Review employees in attendance at the wedding, Ford could offer none, despite circulating the same unverified approximation through sympathetic media outlets earlier that day in order to discredit The Daily Caller’s reporting.
Ford also could not provide The Daily Caller with a specific number of Harvard Law Review employees who worked with Obama and Genachowski during that year. A photo taken of the Harvard Law Review during Obama and Genachowski’s final year of law school contains 70 people.
The ABC spokesman’s assertion that “nearly the entire Law Review” attended the wedding cast doubt on the significance of Obama’s attendance. But Ford’s unwillingness to document that claim now suggests that Obama was among a close circle of fewer Harvard classmates who were personal friends of Raddatz and Genachowski.
Instead, Ford maintained his ambiguity in subsequent statements to The Daily Caller, identifying only one other Harvard Law Review classmate of Obama and Genachowski who attended the wedding.
When TheDC asked Ford via email Tuesday night for further specifics on actual numbers, he did not respond with any.
The FCC, the Obama campaign and the Romney campaign also did not respond to The Daily Caller’s request for comment.
David Martosko contributed reporting.
After TheDC made preliminary inquiries Monday to confirm Obama’s attendance at the wedding, ABC leaked a pre-emptive statement to news outlets including Politico and The Daily Beast Tuesday, revealing what may have been internal network pressure felt just days before Raddatz was scheduled to moderate the one and only vice-presidential debate Thursday night.
Both Politico and The Daily Beast jumped to ABC and Raddatz’s defense. The Huffington Post, a liberal news outlet, joined them shortly thereafter, while calling “unusual” ABC’s attempt to kill the story before it gained wide circulation.
Genachowski — called “Jay” at the time of his wedding, sources told TheDC — and Raddatz would go on to have a son together before their divorce in 1997. They have both since remarried to other people.
A source who attended the 1991 wedding told TheDC that Obama was also a guest there, and remembered that a man by the name of “Barry Obama” was among the guests dancing at the reception. (RELATED: Marital, personal ties link Obama administration to Commission on Presidential Debates)
In August, The Daily Caller first connected Genachowski, an Obama appointee, to Raddatz following her selection as the vice presidential debate moderator by the left-leaning Commission on Presidential Debates. That debate, between Congressman Paul Ryan and Vice President Joe Biden, will take place Thursday night at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky.
Carol Platt Liebau, a political commentator who was a Harvard Law Review colleague of Genachowski and Obama, wrote that “despite being a year below both men on the Review and not close personal friends with either of them,” she remembered Genachowski and Raddatz’s relationship as “quite public” during those days, and that “Raddatz visited Boston frequently.”
Genachowski’s friendship with Obama would continue through the campaign trail in 2008 and into the White House: He aggressively fundraised for Obama in 2008 as a campaign bundler, and served on the presidential transition team before winning his appointment to chair the FCC.
On Monday evening ABC spokesman David Ford grudgingly confirmed Obama’s attendance at the wedding, after shielding Raddatz in August by declining to comment when The Daily Caller first reported the story.
“This is absurd,” Ford said, in the same statement now circulated by ABC’s media allies on the left.
Obama, Ford wrote, “attended their wedding over two decades ago along with nearly the entire Law Review, many of whom went onto successful careers, including some in the Bush administration,” he said without providing a specific number of Harvard Law Review employees to verify the statement.
When pressed further on Tuesday for a specific number of Harvard Law Review employees in attendance at the wedding, Ford could offer none, despite circulating the same unverified approximation through sympathetic media outlets earlier that day in order to discredit The Daily Caller’s reporting.
Ford also could not provide The Daily Caller with a specific number of Harvard Law Review employees who worked with Obama and Genachowski during that year. A photo taken of the Harvard Law Review during Obama and Genachowski’s final year of law school contains 70 people.
The ABC spokesman’s assertion that “nearly the entire Law Review” attended the wedding cast doubt on the significance of Obama’s attendance. But Ford’s unwillingness to document that claim now suggests that Obama was among a close circle of fewer Harvard classmates who were personal friends of Raddatz and Genachowski.
Instead, Ford maintained his ambiguity in subsequent statements to The Daily Caller, identifying only one other Harvard Law Review classmate of Obama and Genachowski who attended the wedding.
When TheDC asked Ford via email Tuesday night for further specifics on actual numbers, he did not respond with any.
The FCC, the Obama campaign and the Romney campaign also did not respond to The Daily Caller’s request for comment.
David Martosko contributed reporting.